{"id":389847,"date":"2026-03-06T13:18:49","date_gmt":"2026-03-06T12:18:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/?post_type=publicacion&p=389847"},"modified":"2026-03-06T13:18:51","modified_gmt":"2026-03-06T12:18:51","slug":"the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis","status":"publish","type":"publicacion","link":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/","title":{"rendered":"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the “event giving rise to the infringement” and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n

This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n \"icon\"\n

Download document<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n View document \"icon\"\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
Autor\/s<\/div>\n
\n

\n <\/span>\n \u00c1ngel Garc\u00eda Vidal<\/span>\n – Academic Counsel<\/span>\n <\/p>\n

\n <\/span>\n Rais Amils<\/a>\n – Partner<\/span>\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n

\n
Category<\/div>\n

\n <\/span>\n Analysis<\/span>\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n \n

\n
Areas and sectors<\/div>\n

\n <\/span>\n Intellectual Property<\/a>\n <\/p>\n

\n <\/span>\n Life Sciences and Healthcare<\/a>\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n See previous \"icon\"\n <\/a>\n See next \"icon\"\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n
\n \"\u00c1ngel <\/div>\n
\n
\u00c1ngel Garc\u00eda Vidal<\/div>\n
Academic Counsel<\/div>\n
\n
\n \"email\"\n\n agarciav@ga-p.com<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n Madrid<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Corporate and M&A, <\/a>\n Intellectual Property<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \"icon\"\n\n \"icon\"\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n \n
\n \"Rais <\/div>\n <\/a>\n
\n \n
Rais Amils<\/div>\n <\/a>\n
Partner<\/div>\n
\n \"email\"\n\n ramils@ga-p.com<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n Intellectual Property<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n Barcelona<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \"icon\"\n\n (+34) 93 415 74 00<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n \"icon\"\n \"icon\"\n \n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n \"\u00c1ngel <\/div>\n
\n
\u00c1ngel Garc\u00eda Vidal<\/div>\n
Academic Counsel<\/div>\n
\n
\n \"email\"\n\n agarciav@ga-p.com<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n Madrid<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n Corporate and M&A, <\/a>\n Intellectual Property<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \"icon\"\n\n \"icon\"\n\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n \n
\n \"Rais <\/div>\n <\/a>\n
\n \n
Rais Amils<\/div>\n <\/a>\n
Partner<\/div>\n
\n \"email\"\n\n ramils@ga-p.com<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n Intellectual Property<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n Barcelona<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \"icon\"\n\n (+34) 93 415 74 00<\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n \"icon\"\n \"icon\"\n \n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"icon\"<\/div>\n
\"icon\"<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":389768,"template":"","publicacion_categoria":[126],"class_list":["post-389847","publicacion","type-publicacion","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","publicacion_categoria-analysis-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the "event giving rise to the infringement" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis - Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the "event giving rise to the infringement" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis - Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-06T12:18:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Analysis_eng.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1308\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/\",\"name\":\"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the \\\"event giving rise to the infringement\\\" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis - Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Analysis_eng.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-06T12:18:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-06T12:18:51+00:00\",\"description\":\"This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Analysis_eng.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Analysis_eng.jpg\",\"width\":2500,\"height\":1308},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/publications\\\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the \u00abevent giving rise to the infringement\u00bb and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo & Pombo\",\"description\":\"G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo es una firma de abogados independiente, con experiencia internacional, especializada en todas las \u00e1reas del derecho de los negocio.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo & Pombo\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/Logo-1-1.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/Logo-1-1.svg\",\"caption\":\"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo & Pombo\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ga-p.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the \"event giving rise to the infringement\" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis - Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo","description":"This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the \"event giving rise to the infringement\" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis - Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo","og_description":"This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.","og_url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/","og_site_name":"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo","article_modified_time":"2026-03-06T12:18:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2500,"height":1308,"url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Analysis_eng.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/","url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/","name":"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the \"event giving rise to the infringement\" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis - Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Analysis_eng.jpg","datePublished":"2026-03-06T12:18:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-06T12:18:51+00:00","description":"This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant\u2014unduly\u2014the burden of proving the specifics of national law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Analysis_eng.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Analysis_eng.jpg","width":2500,"height":1308},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/publications\/the-long-arm-of-the-unified-patent-court-based-on-the-event-giving-rise-to-the-infringement-and-considerations-on-the-application-of-lex-loci-protectionis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the \u00abevent giving rise to the infringement\u00bb and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/","name":"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo & Pombo","description":"G\u00f3mez-Acebo y Pombo es una firma de abogados independiente, con experiencia internacional, especializada en todas las \u00e1reas del derecho de los negocio.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo & Pombo","url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Logo-1-1.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Logo-1-1.svg","caption":"Despacho de abogados G\u00f3mez-Acebo & Pombo"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publicacion\/389847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publicacion"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publicacion"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/389768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=389847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publicacion_categoria","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ga-p.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publicacion_categoria?post=389847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}