Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Solventis on the incorporation of Seresco to BME Growth
1 of December, 2022
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised the Solventis group as underwriter in the process of SERESCO’s incorporation to BME Growth.
With its IPO, SERESCO will become the thirteenth company to join BME Growth so far this year and the third in the technology sector. SERESCO is a technology company that provides solutions in IT infrastructures and systems, digital transformation, payroll and personnel administration. It also specialises in land registry management or cartography and the development of innovative software, tailored to specific needs such as precision agriculture.
Solventis is an independent financial group founded in 2002 by a team of professionals from different areas of investment banking with the aim of presenting a new concept in financial services.
Advised on the transaction: Augusto Piñel, partner, Jacobo Palanca, Emiliano Moreno and Irene Carreño Uría, Commercial associates.
With its IPO, SERESCO will become the thirteenth company to join BME Growth so far this year and the third in the technology sector. SERESCO is a technology company that provides solutions in IT infrastructures and systems, digital transformation, payroll and personnel administration. It also specialises in land registry management or cartography and the development of innovative software, tailored to specific needs such as precision agriculture.
Solventis is an independent financial group founded in 2002 by a team of professionals from different areas of investment banking with the aim of presenting a new concept in financial services.
Advised on the transaction: Augusto Piñel, partner, Jacobo Palanca, Emiliano Moreno and Irene Carreño Uría, Commercial associates.
Lawyer mentioned
Augusto Piñel – Partner
Jacobo Palanca – Senior Associate
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Tipology
Deal
Areas and sectors
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
6 days ago 
PUBLICATION
13 Dec, 2024
Invalidity of franchise providing for franchisor price-setting: implications in terms of restitution
The age-old problem of whether Article 1303 or 1306 of the Civil Code applies to contracts in breach of competition law.
13 Dec, 2024 
PUBLICATION
13 Dec, 2024
Automotive and Mobility No. 25
Summary of legislative and case law developments in the automotive sector.
13 Dec, 2024
PUBLICATION
28 Nov, 2024
Automoción y Movilidad N.º 25
Resumen de novedades legislativas y jurisprudenciales relativas al sector de la Automoción.
28 Nov, 2024
PUBLICATION
18 Oct, 2021
Inside Information and Quarterly Financial Statements: CNMV Communication of 13 October 2021
The CNMV notes in this communication that, although there are no closed periods in respect of the voluntary publication by issuers of the quarterly financial report, this report may contain inside information, in which case the Market Abuse Regulation applies
18 Oct, 2021
PUBLICATION
13 Nov, 2020
Administrative liability of the members of a listed company’s audit committee for serious errors or inaccuracies in the audited annual accounts
The Supreme Court's judgment of 8 October 2020 confirms the administrative liability of Audit Committee members for the inaccuracy or lack of veracity of consolidated annual accounts that have been externally audited
13 Nov, 2020
PUBLICATION
10 Jul, 2018
Current Legislation No. 24
GA_P’s Current Legislation digests seek to provide an overview of the main legal issues of interest to our readers, clients and lawyers in a format that combines three elements: topicality, clarity and quality. Topicality in the information and in the selection of matters discussed; clarity in laying the foregoing in a concise and intelligible manner rather than...
10 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
05 Jul, 2018
Payment periods disallowed under the Late Commercial Payments Act: inappropriate voidness
We are accustomed to hearing the assertion that a bilaterally agreed clause contravening the statutory rule setting a time limit for commercial payments is void ab initio. But is this case when it is the supplier who has the bargaining power? And, in general, does such an assertion make sense?
05 Jul, 2018