Go back to News
NEWS
Guillermo Guerra on sustainability and good corporate governance | Cap&Corp
Guillermo Guerra has participated in the latest issue of Capital&Corporate in an interview in which he talks about sustainability and good corporate governance.
See full interview
See full interview
Lawyer mentioned
Guillermo Guerra – Partner
Press contact

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
A first ranking mortgage does not prevent a creditor from accelerating loan maturity due to debtor insolvency
If the creditor has a secured claim (even if the debt is covered by the "value of the security", i.e. the claim is in the money), the debtor cannot avoid the effects of the to-term forfeiture by appealing to the existence of that security because the guarantee referred to in Article 1129(1) of the Civil Code (avoiding to-term forfeiture) must then be another additional guarantee.
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
La existencia de una hipoteca de primer rango no impide que el acreedor pueda declarar el vencimiento anticipado del plazo por insolvencia sobrevenida del deudor
Si el acreedor goza de una garantía real para la seguridad de su crédito (incluso si la deuda está cubierta por el «valor de la garantía», es decir, que el crédito está in the money), el deudor no puede evitar los efectos de la pérdida del plazo apelando a la existencia de aquella garantía real porque la garantía a que se refiere el artículo 1129.1.º del Código Civil (evitadora de la pérdida del plazo) deberá ser entonces otra garantía suplementaria.
PUBLICATION
14 Mar, 2025
A good ruling on financial assistance: collateral given to secure third-party borrowings is not invalid
This latest Supreme Court ruling on the prohibition of financial assistance in the purchase of shares in the assisting company (assisting as ‘borrower for third party debt’) is to be praised, erasing the bad taste left by the reading of the immediate precedent (Supreme Court Judgment of 20 April 2023, Ezentis) which held an agreement to underwrite the value of the shares sold by the company invalid.
PUBLICATION
06 Mar, 2025
Calling of meeting of shareholders, abuse of rights, resistance test
Once again: despite compliance with the formal requirements of a calling of meeting of shareholders, company resolutions may be unenforceable if there is an abuse of rights in said call
PUBLICATION
04 Mar, 2025
Rules to determine directors' remuneration: a case where Article 217(4) of the Companies Act applies
The Supreme Court applies the rules set out in Article 217(4) of the Companies Act to reach a decision concerning the contest of a board resolution that determined the remuneration of a company director.
PUBLICATION
27 Feb, 2025
An end to rules on racial, gender and LGTBQ+ diversity on Nasdaq-listed company boards
In Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment; NCPPR v. SEC, the U.S. Court of Appeals vacates, by a one-vote margin, the Securities & Exchange Commission’s approval in 2021 of Nasdaq’s rules on board diversity for companies listed on its exchange.
PUBLICATION
11 Feb, 2025
The concept of transferable securities and the exclusion of municipalities as qualified investors for the purposes of prospectus publications: CJEU judgment of 9 January 2025
In this judgment, the CJEU considers that shares whose transfer is subject to approval by the board of directors can be considered transferable securities for the purposes of the European prospectus legislation and MiFID.
PUBLICATION
29 Jan, 2025
Medidas y prórroga de medidas laborales y de seguridad social a la espera de los Presupuestos Generales del Estado
Ante la ausencia de Presupuestos Generales del Estado, se aprueban medidas urgentes que, en el ámbito laboral y de la Seguridad Social, permiten actualizar algunas cuantías y aplicar algunas normas previstas para el 2025.
PUBLICATION
02 Jan, 2025
Retracto arrendaticio en las ventas en bloque de vivienda protegida por parte de la Administración titular (STS 1597/2024, de 28 noviembre)
No es lo mismo a efectos del retracto vender miles de viviendas arrendadas que vender todas las viviendas arrendadas de un edificio.