Go back to News
NEWS
Nuno de Oliveira Garcia on tax levied on the financial sector, created to accommodate the Covid-19 pandemic in public accounts | Advocatus
Nuno de Oliveira Garcia, coordinating partner of the tax area of the Lisbon office, answers a few questions for an article in Advocatus: “Additional tax on banking is unconstitutional. And now, quid iuris?”.
He argues that “In crisis situations, first in the 2008-2013 recession and more recently in the COVID Pandemic, there is always the temptation to create contributions or additional(…)”
Read the full article.
He argues that “In crisis situations, first in the 2008-2013 recession and more recently in the COVID Pandemic, there is always the temptation to create contributions or additional(…)”
Read the full article.
Lawyer mentioned
Nuno de Oliveira Garcia – Partner
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 28
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
One week ago
Domain name infringement of a subsequently registered trade mark
An interesting ruling has recently been handed down in relation to a case in which a domain name holder turned to the courts after losing in the ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) procedure, specifically Supreme Court (Civil Division) Judgment no. 1341/2025 of 30 September (ECLI:ES:TS:2025:4206).
PUBLICATION
05 Nov, 2025
Two views on contribution between joint and several co-debtors under Article 1145 of the Civil Code
In both cases, these are contributions without the entire joint debt having been paid.
PUBLICATION
29 Oct, 2025
Recent developments in the carbon border adjustment mechanism: simplifications and obligations as of 2026
Regulation (EU) 2025/2083 simplifies the carbon border adjustment mechanism in order to reduce burdens as of 1 January 2026. This paper explains the obligations imposed by this mechanism on the importers it applies to and the simplification measures introduced, including the de minimis exemption based on mass for small importers, excluding electricity and hydrogen.
PUBLICATION
28 Oct, 2025
Borderline products and the precedence of medicinal product legislation
The application of the rule of precedence requires, firstly, that a given product falls within the legal definition of a medicinal product, whether it is a medicinal product by function or by presentation, and secondly, that there are doubts as to whether it also falls within the legal concept of other types of products (food supplements, cosmetics, etc.).
PUBLICATION
22 Oct, 2025
2027 is nearing. Will retirement change significantly?
It has been more than fifteen years since we learned that the pension age would be raised from sixty-five to sixty-seven in 2027. During this time, a number of transitional rules have been applied regarding the pension age and amount, whilst the possibility of work and pension compatibility has also been broadened.
PUBLICATION
17 Oct, 2025
Impact on directors of company debts and penalties under a sector-specific rule
We analyse, in short, whether company payment contributions can be included in director liability (to company) claims.
PUBLICATION
14 Oct, 2025
Danish cases in Spain: Beneficial owner requirement not applicable to the non-resident income tax exemption of interest payments to EU residents
Contrary to the stance taken by the Audiencia Nacional, the Valencia High Court of Justice takes the view that the exemption of interest payments to European Union residents should be applied in accordance with the terms that the national legislature has chosen to keep, without the additional requirements of Directive 2003/49/EC. If abusive practices are found to exist, tax regularisation must be carried out by resorting to one of the general anti-abuse clauses provided for in the Taxation Act.
PUBLICATION
09 Oct, 2025
Payment service providers’ rectification of unauthorised or incorrectly executed payment transactions: user obligations
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber), in its judgment of 1 August 2025, case C-665/23, IL v. Veracash SAS, concludes that a payer is deprived of the right to reimbursement of the amount of an unauthorised transaction if he or she delayed in notifying his or her payment service provider of the unauthorised payment transaction, even though he or she did so within 13 months from the debit date. This interpretation of the Payment Services Directive is applicable in Spain (Art. 43 RDL 19/2018) and appears to be retained in the future Regulation on payment services.