Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Tubos Reunidos on the sale to GESCRAP of its industrial complex in Sestao
17 October, 2024
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo advised Tubos Reunidos, an industrial group producing steel pipes, on the sale of its industrial complex in Sestao to GESCRAP.
The transaction included the sale of its industrial assets, comprising various complementary facilities, with a total built-up area of 33,147 sqm, located on a set of plots covering 83,107 sqm of gross floor area.
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo acted as legal advisor and BNP Paribas Real Estate acted as real estate advisor.
The legal team for Tubos Reunidos was composed of Inés Nuñez de la Parte and Bruno Arroita, and for Gómez-Acebo & Pombo, Estibaliz Aranburu, Enrique Isla, Carmen García, Sofía Inés Sáenz de Valluerca, Sofía Inés Sáenz de Valluerca, Marina Martínez, Carlos Vázquez, Rafael Aguilera, Irene Medina de Alba, Aitor Soloeta and Zuriñe Martínez.
Category
Deal
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
3 days ago 
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
Pharma & Healthcare No. 49
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
2 days ago 
PUBLICATION
One week ago
Royal Decree 415/2026: key aspects of the new health technology assessment system
Royal Decree 415/2026 establishes a unified framework for the assessment of health technologies in Spain, distinguishing between the technical assessment and the administrative decision regarding funding, pricing or inclusion in the service catalogue, and incorporating the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282. The aspect that raises the most legal questions in this new piece of legislation is the connection between the assessment regulated by the Royal Decree and the procedures for funding, pricing, and inclusion in the service catalogue.
One week ago
PUBLICATION
09 Jun, 2026
The “serious risk” of financial assistance (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment of 5 May 2026)
This paper critically analyses the Supreme Court ruling of 5May 2026, which applies the prohibition on financial assistance to a case involving the sale of treasury shares with deferred payment to the shareholders of the assisting company.
09 Jun, 2026
PUBLICATION
04 Jun, 2026
The Court of Justice of the European Union clarifies the impact on VAT of intra-group transfer pricing adjustments
The Court of Justice, in the Stellantis Portugal case, confirms that a transfer pricing adjustment intended to ensure a specific profit margin, even if certain repair or warranty costs are partially taken into account in its calculation, does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that there is an independent supply of services subject to value-added tax. The determining factors are the existence of a legal relationship involving reciprocal consideration and a direct link between the identifiable service and the consideration received.
04 Jun, 2026
PUBLICATION
01 Jun, 2026
NGT plant patenting: betwixt and between regulatory continuity and expectations
The evolution of the concept of genetically modified organisms in the European Union in light of new genomic techniques (NGTs) is examined, along with the regulatory response that introduces a distinction between two categories of NGT plants, making the regime more flexible for those that can be considered equivalent to conventional plants. It also highlights that the institutional agreement reflected in the Council’s position represents a significant shift from the case law of the Court of Justice. Regarding patents, it highlights the absence of substantial changes, opting instead for a cautious approach based on transparency, monitoring, and possible future intervention.
01 Jun, 2026
PUBLICATION
28 May, 2026
Voluntary takeover bids and squeeze-outs
The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026 (Korfin and Sempiola v Slovnaft, Case C-225/25) clarifies the concept of a takeover bid for the purposes of Article 2 of the 2004 Takeover Bids Directive, such that an offer made to the holders of securities of a company with a view to acquiring all or some of those securities does not fall within the concept of a takeover bid where it is made by an offeror who already controls the offeree company. Consequently, based on that court’s interpretation of the Directive’s provisions, there is no right of squeeze-out in such voluntary takeover bids.
28 May, 2026
PUBLICATION
25 May, 2026
Joint interpretative instrument between Spain and Brazil on the classification of Brazilian juros
In this paper we address the controversy that the taxation of Brazilian interest has sparked both during the period when the recast version of the Corporate Income Tax Act was in force and since the Corporate Income Tax Act came into effect. Its possible classification, either as dividends or as interest, has been analysed on several occasions by Spanish courts and tax authority, the latter having recently agreed with its Brazilian counterpart to treat it as “interest” for the purposes of the Spain/Brazil Double Taxation Convention.
25 May, 2026
Tax Litigation
18 May, 2026
Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations
Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations
18 May, 2026
PUBLICATION
18 May, 2026
Use as pastiche of another person's work or rendition protected by copyright
This paper examines the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 April 2026, Pelham (C-590/23, ECLI:EU:C:2026:290), which interprets the exception for pastiche contained in Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.
18 May, 2026