Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Tubos Reunidos on the sale to GESCRAP of its industrial complex in Sestao
17 October, 2024
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo advised Tubos Reunidos, an industrial group producing steel pipes, on the sale of its industrial complex in Sestao to GESCRAP.
The transaction included the sale of its industrial assets, comprising various complementary facilities, with a total built-up area of 33,147 sqm, located on a set of plots covering 83,107 sqm of gross floor area.
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo acted as legal advisor and BNP Paribas Real Estate acted as real estate advisor.
The legal team for Tubos Reunidos was composed of Inés Nuñez de la Parte and Bruno Arroita, and for Gómez-Acebo & Pombo, Estibaliz Aranburu, Enrique Isla, Carmen García, Sofía Inés Sáenz de Valluerca, Sofía Inés Sáenz de Valluerca, Marina Martínez, Carlos Vázquez, Rafael Aguilera, Irene Medina de Alba, Aitor Soloeta and Zuriñe Martínez.
Category
Deal
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
4 days ago 
PUBLICATION
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
23 Sep, 2026 
PUBLICATION
22 Sep, 2026
Social security deregistration over the weekend or on a non-working day to re-register on the next working day may be exempt from penalties
Employees who are deregistered over the weekend or on a non-working day and re-registered on the following working day do not engage in any conduct classified as a violation under employment penalty rules, although the employer’s conduct may, where applicable, be subject to liability of a different nature.
22 Sep, 2026
PUBLICATION
21 Sep, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 50
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
21 Sep, 2026
PUBLICATION
18 Sep, 2026
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
18 Sep, 2026
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Public consultation now open on the Royal Decree regulating the requirements for energy sustainability, environmental sustainability, digital resilience and digital sovereignty applicable to data centres
11 Sep, 2026
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Agreement offsetting leasehold improvements against future commercial lease payments: third-party purchaser takes the stage
Is a set-off agreement enforceable against a purchaser seeking to collect new lease payments? Although the answer is not clear-cut, ultimately the lessee will not leave without compensation for the improvements
11 Sep, 2026
PUBLICATION
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
31 Jul, 2026
PUBLICATION
28 Jul, 2026
Derogations from the principle of supervision in the home Member State in respect of information society services and control over content by means of an algorithm
The Court (Grand Chamber) defines the scope of derogations from the principle of supervision in the home Member State for information society services on grounds of public policy, security and safety, clarifying the distinction between general prohibitions and individualized measures directed at specific providers. It also provides important criteria regarding the liability of digital platforms, holding that control exercised by means of algorithms may preclude the application of the exemption from liability provided for data hosting services.
28 Jul, 2026
PUBLICATION
08 Jul, 2026
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.
08 Jul, 2026