Go back to News
NEWS
Europe strengthens its rules to safeguard free competition in times of crisis | Jornal de Negócios
Joaquim Caimoto Duarte, Counsel for Competition and EU Law and current President of ICC Portugal, discusses in this interview the role of regulation and specialised courts in addressing global challenges and European interventionism.
Joaquim highlights the importance of free competition as a driving force for innovation and consumer protection, particularly during periods of crisis and international rivalry.
He points out that Portugal enjoys an advantage thanks to its specialised court, which brings coherence and agility to decision-making. He also comments on how, within the European Union, the strengthening of intervention in strategic sectors aims to enhance competitiveness against global rivals, without slipping into protectionism.
The expert further warns of the challenges posed by artificial intelligence, stressing the need for vigilance to prevent excessive concentration within technological platforms.
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
23 Jun, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 49
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
09 Jun, 2026
Partial limitation defences that may be raised in relation to the limitation period within a cartel (Supreme Court Judgment no. 681/2026 of 6 May)
A flawed judgment on a problem that has remained unresolved to date in the truck cartel. The issue is not whether the liability-in-solidum regime applies, but whether co-liable parties can raise personal defences.
PUBLICATION
04 Jun, 2026
Unanimous shareholders' agreements and dividends in specie
The Supreme Court and the Madrid Provincial Court, following established legal doctrine, have reiterated that a party to a unanimous shareholders’ agreement acts in bad faith if he or she challenges a company resolution passed in compliance with said shareholders’ agreement. In this case, the shareholders’ agreement provided for the possibility of paying dividends in kind, and the contested resolution — which was passed by a majority at the shareholders’ meeting — transferred certain real estate properties to one of the shareholders (with his consent) in payment of the dividend due to him.
PUBLICATION
27 May, 2026
An action for declaration of invalidity of an already-terminated franchise agreement is admissible
An action for declaration of invalidity of an agreement can almost always be brought, even if the agreement has been performed and terminated.
PUBLICATION
30 Apr, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 48
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
26 Feb, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 47
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
09 Dec, 2025
Pharma & Healthcare No. 46
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
30 Sep, 2025
Court of Justice rules that lower courts may disregard decisions of higher courts that violate independence and impartiality
The Court of Justice ruling of 4 September 2025 (C-225/22) has declared that national courts may set aside decisions of higher courts that do not comply with the requirements of independence and impartiality derived from Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
PUBLICATION
25 Sep, 2025
Prohibition of arbitration in the single energy market
The Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty gives the force and effect of law to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, according to which Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty does not and could not apply as a legal basis for intra-EU arbitration proceedings as a mechanism for the settlement of disputes between a contracting State and an investor of another contracting State.