Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Consilium Safety Group AB on the acquisition of the remaining shareholding in the Spanish company Consilium Spain
15 of June, 2022
GA_P advises Consilium Safety Group AB on the acquisition of the remaining shareholding in the Spanish company Consilium Spain
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Consilium Safety Group AB on the acquisition of the remaining shareholding in the Spanish company Consilium Spain until the acquisition of 100%.
Consilium Safety Group AB is a leading global producer of safety technologies for the maritime, oil and gas, transport and construction industries.
Fernando de las Cuevas, Sergio Gómez and Eugenia Álvarez-Pedrosa, partner, associate and paralegal of Mercantil, and Lourdes Escassi and Carmen Abad, associates of Laboral, advised on the transaction.
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Consilium Safety Group AB on the acquisition of the remaining shareholding in the Spanish company Consilium Spain until the acquisition of 100%.
Consilium Safety Group AB is a leading global producer of safety technologies for the maritime, oil and gas, transport and construction industries.
Fernando de las Cuevas, Sergio Gómez and Eugenia Álvarez-Pedrosa, partner, associate and paralegal of Mercantil, and Lourdes Escassi and Carmen Abad, associates of Laboral, advised on the transaction.
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
2 days ago 
PUBLICATION
Universal service in telecommunications: guidance for determining when it represents an unfair burden and the adoption of a cost-sharing system is appropriate
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled once again on the financing of the universal telecommunications service: there are no r. to be excluded from the cost-sharing system; the decision based on market competition lies with national regulatory authorities.
3 days ago 
PUBLICATION
Inside Information and Quarterly Financial Statements: CNMV Communication of 13 October 2021
The CNMV notes in this communication that, although there are no closed periods in respect of the voluntary publication by issuers of the quarterly financial report, this report may contain inside information, in which case the Market Abuse Regulation applies
18 Oct, 2021
PUBLICATION
Radio spectrum (700 MHz band) auctioned for 5G technology development in Spain
Publication of Order ETD/534/2021, of 26 May, approving the technical specifications and the terms and criteria for award by auction of concessions for the non-shared use of the radio spectrum in the 700 MHz band and giving notice of the relevant auction
01 Jun, 2021
PUBLICATION
Digital Content and Services – New consumers and users’ rights
Last week on 27 April, Royal Decree-act 7/2021 of 27 April on the transposition of European Union directives on competition, prevention of money laundering, credit institutions, telecommunications, tax measures, prevention and repair of environmental damage, movement of employees in the provision of transnational services and consumer defence (“RDL 7/2021”).
18 May, 2021
PUBLICATION
Administrative liability of the members of a listed company’s audit committee for serious errors or inaccuracies in the audited annual accounts
The Supreme Court's judgment of 8 October 2020 confirms the administrative liability of Audit Committee members for the inaccuracy or lack of veracity of consolidated annual accounts that have been externally audited
13 Nov, 2020
PUBLICATION
Current Legislation No. 24
GA_P’s Current Legislation digests seek to provide an overview of the main legal issues of interest to our readers, clients and lawyers in a format that combines three elements: topicality, clarity and quality. Topicality in the information and in the selection of matters discussed; clarity in laying the foregoing in a concise and intelligible manner rather than...
10 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
Payment periods disallowed under the Late Commercial Payments Act: inappropriate voidness
We are accustomed to hearing the assertion that a bilaterally agreed clause contravening the statutory rule setting a time limit for commercial payments is void ab initio. But is this case when it is the supplier who has the bargaining power? And, in general, does such an assertion make sense?
05 Jul, 2018