Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Freshly Cosmetics on the entry of a new investor
11 November, 2021
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Freshly Cosmetics on the entry of Blossom Capital as a new investor in the company’s share capital. The funds obtained from the transaction will be used for the Company’s international expansion and the development of new products.
Freshly Cosmetics is a company dedicated to the production of natural cosmetics. The start-up recorded a gross operating profit (ebitda) of 3.5 million and a positive net profit. It generates 10% of its sales abroad and hopes to increase this percentage to 20% by 2021. The company’s main markets are Italy, France, Belgium and Portugal.
The GA_P team was formed by Álex Pujol and Diana Urrego, partner and associate respectively, from Corporate and Commercial.
Freshly Cosmetics is a company dedicated to the production of natural cosmetics. The start-up recorded a gross operating profit (ebitda) of 3.5 million and a positive net profit. It generates 10% of its sales abroad and hopes to increase this percentage to 20% by 2021. The company’s main markets are Italy, France, Belgium and Portugal.
The GA_P team was formed by Álex Pujol and Diana Urrego, partner and associate respectively, from Corporate and Commercial.
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
5 days ago 
PUBLICATION
3 days ago
Impact on directors of company debts and penalties under a sector-specific rule
We analyse, in short, whether company payment contributions can be included in director liability (to company) claims.
3 days ago 
PUBLICATION
01 Oct, 2025
Contractual termination by mutual abandonment not claimed by any party?
The risks of applying the doctrine according to which a contract is deemed withdrawn from if neither party to the same appears to want it. Not only is this solution likely to be inconsistent with the parties' claims, but it also wrongly rules out other civil law options the parties could pursue upon dismissal of the action for declaration of termination.
01 Oct, 2025
PUBLICATION
05 Aug, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 27
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
05 Aug, 2025
PUBLICATION
09 Jul, 2025
Once again on the obligations assumed by the signers of a "strong" comfort letter
09 Jul, 2025
PUBLICATION
19 Jun, 2025
Company resolutions reached with invalid votes
Although Article 204(3)(d) places them on the same level, the erroneous counting of votes and the counting of invalid votes are very different, given that the latter requires judicial balancing.
19 Jun, 2025
PUBLICATION
12 May, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 26
Summary of legislative and case law developments in the automotive sector.
12 May, 2025
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
A first ranking mortgage does not prevent a creditor from accelerating loan maturity due to debtor insolvency
If the creditor has a secured claim (even if the debt is covered by the "value of the security", i.e. the claim is in the money), the debtor cannot avoid the effects of the to-term forfeiture by appealing to the existence of that security because the guarantee referred to in Article 1129(1) of the Civil Code (avoiding to-term forfeiture) must then be another additional guarantee.
25 Mar, 2025
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
La existencia de una hipoteca de primer rango no impide que el acreedor pueda declarar el vencimiento anticipado del plazo por insolvencia sobrevenida del deudor
Si el acreedor goza de una garantía real para la seguridad de su crédito (incluso si la deuda está cubierta por el «valor de la garantía», es decir, que el crédito está in the money), el deudor no puede evitar los efectos de la pérdida del plazo apelando a la existencia de aquella garantía real porque la garantía a que se refiere el artículo 1129.1.º del Código Civil (evitadora de la pérdida del plazo) deberá ser entonces otra garantía suplementaria.
25 Mar, 2025
PUBLICATION
14 Mar, 2025
A good ruling on financial assistance: collateral given to secure third-party borrowings is not invalid
This latest Supreme Court ruling on the prohibition of financial assistance in the purchase of shares in the assisting company (assisting as ‘borrower for third party debt’) is to be praised, erasing the bad taste left by the reading of the immediate precedent (Supreme Court Judgment of 20 April 2023, Ezentis) which held an agreement to underwrite the value of the shares sold by the company invalid.
14 Mar, 2025