Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises the partners of BUSUU on its sale to the listed company CHEGG
29 of November, 2021
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised the partners of BUSUU on its sale to the American education technology company listed on the NYSE, CHEGG. The amount of the acquisition was €385 million, which makes it one of the most relevant exits in the history of the Spanish entrepreneurial ecosystem.
BUSUU is a language learning technology platform with more than 120 million learners located in 160 countries. This acquisition will allow CHEGG to increase its presence in international markets, as well as accelerate BUSUU’s growth in the US market.
The GA_P team has been formed by: Álvaro Mateo, Alba Pérez, Patricia Pérez and Inés López, partner, associates and trainee of Corporate, Borja González and Jesús Tallos, of counsel and associate of Labour, Bárbara Sainz de Vicuña, associate of Industrial Property, Intellectual Property and Technology, Eduardo Martínez-Matosas and Luis Cuesta, partner and associate of Tax and Juan Romero, of counsel of Public.
BUSUU is a language learning technology platform with more than 120 million learners located in 160 countries. This acquisition will allow CHEGG to increase its presence in international markets, as well as accelerate BUSUU’s growth in the US market.
The GA_P team has been formed by: Álvaro Mateo, Alba Pérez, Patricia Pérez and Inés López, partner, associates and trainee of Corporate, Borja González and Jesús Tallos, of counsel and associate of Labour, Bárbara Sainz de Vicuña, associate of Industrial Property, Intellectual Property and Technology, Eduardo Martínez-Matosas and Luis Cuesta, partner and associate of Tax and Juan Romero, of counsel of Public.
Lawyer mentioned
Álvaro Mateo Sixto – Partner
Borja González Elejabarrieta – Counsel
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Tipology
Deal
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
¡NEW! 
PUBLICATION
13 Dec, 2024
Invalidity of franchise providing for franchisor price-setting: implications in terms of restitution
The age-old problem of whether Article 1303 or 1306 of the Civil Code applies to contracts in breach of competition law.
13 Dec, 2024 
PUBLICATION
13 Dec, 2024
Automotive and Mobility No. 25
Summary of legislative and case law developments in the automotive sector.
13 Dec, 2024
PUBLICATION
28 Nov, 2024
Automoción y Movilidad N.º 25
Resumen de novedades legislativas y jurisprudenciales relativas al sector de la Automoción.
28 Nov, 2024
PUBLICATION
18 Oct, 2021
Inside Information and Quarterly Financial Statements: CNMV Communication of 13 October 2021
The CNMV notes in this communication that, although there are no closed periods in respect of the voluntary publication by issuers of the quarterly financial report, this report may contain inside information, in which case the Market Abuse Regulation applies
18 Oct, 2021
PUBLICATION
13 Nov, 2020
Administrative liability of the members of a listed company’s audit committee for serious errors or inaccuracies in the audited annual accounts
The Supreme Court's judgment of 8 October 2020 confirms the administrative liability of Audit Committee members for the inaccuracy or lack of veracity of consolidated annual accounts that have been externally audited
13 Nov, 2020
PUBLICATION
10 Jul, 2018
Current Legislation No. 24
GA_P’s Current Legislation digests seek to provide an overview of the main legal issues of interest to our readers, clients and lawyers in a format that combines three elements: topicality, clarity and quality. Topicality in the information and in the selection of matters discussed; clarity in laying the foregoing in a concise and intelligible manner rather than...
10 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
05 Jul, 2018
Payment periods disallowed under the Late Commercial Payments Act: inappropriate voidness
We are accustomed to hearing the assertion that a bilaterally agreed clause contravening the statutory rule setting a time limit for commercial payments is void ab initio. But is this case when it is the supplier who has the bargaining power? And, in general, does such an assertion make sense?
05 Jul, 2018