Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Vista Equity Partners on €2.425m acquisition of Duck Creek
GA_P has advised investment fund Vista Equity Partners on the Spanish leg of the acquisition of Duck Creek Technologies (NASDAQ: DCT) to delist it from the stock exchange.
Vista Equity Partners has reached an agreement with technology company Duck Creek Technologies to acquire it for a total of $2.6 billion (€2.425 billion) in cash. The deal is expected to close in the second quarter of 2023, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions customary in such transactions, after which the entity will be delisted.
Duck Creek specialises in providing customer management software products to insurance companies and broker-dealers.
Vista Equity Partners is a leading global investment fund investing in enterprise software, data and technology companies.
They advised on the transaction: Alex Pujol, partner of Commercial, Andrea Esbrí, senior associate of Commercial, Mònica Martells, associate of Commercial, and Anna Viladás and Paula Ruiz Cotorro from Industrial Property, Intellectual Property and Technology.
Vista Equity Partners has reached an agreement with technology company Duck Creek Technologies to acquire it for a total of $2.6 billion (€2.425 billion) in cash. The deal is expected to close in the second quarter of 2023, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions customary in such transactions, after which the entity will be delisted.
Duck Creek specialises in providing customer management software products to insurance companies and broker-dealers.
Vista Equity Partners is a leading global investment fund investing in enterprise software, data and technology companies.
They advised on the transaction: Alex Pujol, partner of Commercial, Andrea Esbrí, senior associate of Commercial, Mònica Martells, associate of Commercial, and Anna Viladás and Paula Ruiz Cotorro from Industrial Property, Intellectual Property and Technology.
Lawyer mentioned
Andrea Esbrí – Senior associate
Category
Deal
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
The “serious risk” of financial assistance (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment of 5 May 2026)
This paper critically analyses the Supreme Court ruling of 5May 2026, which applies the prohibition on financial assistance to a case involving the sale of treasury shares with deferred payment to the shareholders of the assisting company.
PUBLICATION
28 May, 2026
Voluntary takeover bids and squeeze-outs
The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026 (Korfin and Sempiola v Slovnaft, Case C-225/25) clarifies the concept of a takeover bid for the purposes of Article 2 of the 2004 Takeover Bids Directive, such that an offer made to the holders of securities of a company with a view to acquiring all or some of those securities does not fall within the concept of a takeover bid where it is made by an offeror who already controls the offeree company. Consequently, based on that court’s interpretation of the Directive’s provisions, there is no right of squeeze-out in such voluntary takeover bids.
PUBLICATION
18 May, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 30
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
30 Apr, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 48
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
29 Apr, 2026
Limitation of a patent and the Unified Patent Court’s ‘long arm’
We analyse the problems that arise when a claim is filed with the UPC for infringement of a unitary patent and, at the same time, for infringement of the validation of the basic European patent in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, and the claimant solely limits the unitary patent (because the defendant only files a counterclaim for revocation of the unitary patent with said court, but does not initiate any parallel revocation proceedings with the competent national court against the validations of the basic European patent in States that are not party to said agreement).
PUBLICATION
21 Apr, 2026
The 28th Corporate Regime: the EU Inc.
The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the 28th Regime Corporate Legal Framework – ‘EU Inc.’, dated 18 March 2026, introduces a new form of European private limited company. Originally envisaged for start-ups and scale-ups, it has been decided to allow its adoption by all companies. There is no minimum share capital requirement; shares may have no nominal value and may carry multiple voting rights, among other features. The Commission is expected to approve model articles of association so that a company can be incorporated online in less than forty-eight hours and for less than one hundred euros.
PUBLICATION
17 Apr, 2026
Can a framework agreement lacking an exclusivity or minimum orders clause be discharged by breach?
All cases decided by the Supreme Court and their specific details are discussed. There is no single solution to the problem of terminating a framework supply of services agreement without an exclusivity clause or a minimum purchases obligation.
PUBLICATION
12 Mar, 2026
European reform of the sustainability reporting regime under Directive (EU) 2026/470: consequences of its non-transposition into domestic law
Directive (EU) 2026/470 (Omnibus I) has been published, limiting the obligation to prepare a sustainability report to public-interest entities with more than 1,000 employees and a net turnover of more than €450 million during the preceding financial year, as well as to parent companies of a large group that exceed these figures on a consolidated basis. The Directive amends the audit directive, the accounting directive, the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD) and the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD).
PUBLICATION
11 Mar, 2026
Uncertificated share pledge creation, enforceability and avoidance (Supreme Court Judgment no.183/2026 of 10 February)
In Judgment no. 183/2026, of 10 February, the Supreme Court analysed the requirements for the validity and enforceability of an uncertificated registered share pledge and examined the conditions for its avoidance in the context of insolvency proceedings.