Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P #Top5 M&A Ranking (Q3) | El Confidencial
3 of October, 2023
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo is in fourth position in the ranking by value of M&A transactions according to data from the third quarter of 2023 from the TTR Data platform. Similarly, the Firm also ranks fourth, equal with Uría Menéndez (46 transactions) in the ranking by number of M&A transactions.
In terms of individual lawyer rankings, our coordinating partner for Corporate, Álvaro Mateo, ranks sixth in the ranking of lawyers by number of M&A transactions, and tenth in the ranking of lawyers by value of M&A transactions according to the third quarter data provided by the TTR Data platform.
Read full article
In terms of individual lawyer rankings, our coordinating partner for Corporate, Álvaro Mateo, ranks sixth in the ranking of lawyers by number of M&A transactions, and tenth in the ranking of lawyers by value of M&A transactions according to the third quarter data provided by the TTR Data platform.
Read full article
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
¡NEW! 
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
Treatment within insolvency proceedings of claims arising from post-composition clawbacks
In Judgment no. 519/2025 of 1 April, the Supreme Court tackles the treatment to be given within insolvency proceedings to a claim acknowledged by way of court-ordered clawback (avoidance) prior to court approval of a composition.
2 days ago
PUBLICATION
One week ago
Pharma & Healthcare No. 44
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
One week ago
PUBLICATION
30 Jun, 2025
Main changes introduced by RDL 7/2025 to the milestone system applied in the processing of renewable energy generation projects
Royal Decree-law 7/2025 introduces new regulations which modify and extend the milestone system applied in the processing of renewable energy generation projects
30 Jun, 2025
PUBLICATION
30 Jun, 2025
Main changes introduced by RDL 7/2025 regarding electricity storage projects
Royal Decree-law 7/2025 introduces regulatory changes to the processing and deployment of electricity storage projects
30 Jun, 2025
PUBLICATION
19 Jun, 2025
Company resolutions reached with invalid votes
Although Article 204(3)(d) places them on the same level, the erroneous counting of votes and the counting of invalid votes are very different, given that the latter requires judicial balancing.
19 Jun, 2025
PUBLICATION
13 Jun, 2025
Limits of the Unified Patent Court's long arm with regard to Spain (IV): the recognition and enforcement of court decisions
The Unified Patent Court has jurisdiction, in certain cases and within the limits set by the Brussels Ia Regulation and the Lugano Convention, to hear actions relating to classic European patents validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court. Such decisions may be recognised and enforced in those other countries, but there are cases in which such recognition and enforcement will not be appropriate.
13 Jun, 2025
PUBLICATION
12 Jun, 2025
Limits of the Unified Patent Court's long arm with regard to Spain (III): applicable law
The Unified Patent Court has jurisdiction, in certain cases and within the limits laid down in the Brussels Ia Regulation and the Lugano Convention, to hear actions relating to classic European patents validated in States that are not contracting parties to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court. However, this does not mean that, when hearing such actions, the Court may apply the same rules as if the actions related to a unitary patent.
12 Jun, 2025
PUBLICATION
11 Jun, 2025
Limits of the Unified Patent Court's long arm with regard to Spain (II): the controversial judgment of the Court of Justice in the BSH/Electrolux case
This document sets out and criticises the doctrine established by the CJEU in its Judgment of 25 February 2025, C-339/22, BSH/Electrolux, ECLI:EU:C:2025:108. Although the dispute underlying the judgment was not brought before the UPC, the interpretation of the CJEU in the BSH/Electrolux judgment is equally applicable, since said court is equivalent to the national courts of the contracting states party to the UPC Agreement.
11 Jun, 2025