Go back to News
NEWS
Gómez-Acebo continues its momentum (93 M, +11%) and is on the verge of reaching the 100 M mark
In another outstanding year, the firm headed by Íñigo Erláiz once again broke its ceiling with a global turnover of 92.86m. In Spain, it grew by 11.6% achieving revenues of 83.85 million euros.
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo is the first major Spanish law firm to present results. In 2023, under the leadership of Íñigo Erlaiz, the firm once again surpassed its historical turnover ceiling, recording global revenues of 92.86 million euros, marking a substantial increase of 10.8% compared to the previous year. In Spain, the firm reached 83.85 million euros, representing an impressive growth of 11.6%. The firm attributes these remarkable results to several factors, including the growth experienced in transactional areas and other significant circumstances, such as the successful completion of major transactions like Zegona’s acquisition of Vodafone Spain, the restructuring of Celsa, and the takeover bid for OPDenergy.
With close to 93 million euros in revenue, marking yet another year of double-digit growth—following a 10% growth in 2022—Gómez-Acebo is edging closer to the 100 million euro milestone. Achieving this would align the firm with the legal areas of the Big Four and Pérez-Llorca, with KPMG lawyers closing the gap at 112.77 million euros, according to last year’s figures. The firm highlights not only the exceptional performance of its transactional teams but also the “very good performance” across its other practice areas, including Litigation, Public, Tax, Labour, Industrial Property, Intellectual Property, and New Technologies, all of which experienced growth of over 10%. Despite commendable performances across all offices, the majority of Gómez-Acebo’s turnover remains concentrated in Madrid, accounting for two-thirds of the total. The firm also underscores the growth potential of its Lisbon office, which it plans to bolster in 2024 through strategic hires announced in recent weeks. Furthermore, it notes the “growing weight” of business originating in the Latin American region, with a turnover increase of more than 50%.
Íñigo Erlaiz, managing partner of Gómez-Acebo & Pombo, has stated that they are “proud” of the results obtained “because it is a very balanced and transversal growth”. The firm’s objective, he continues, “is to be leaders in all practice areas” and, although “the growth in itself is not important, it is relevant to the extent that it reflects progress in the direction of improving the positioning set by the firm”. Erlaiz also pointed out significant improvements in other indicators, such as price per hour or turnover per lawyer, driven by the nature of matters the firm has undertaken. “It is a quiet, healthy and very orderly growth”, says GómezAcebo’s managing partner, who recalled that they have made “significant additions” -such as those reported by El Confidencial of former Linklaters Alexander Kolb or Andrew Ward, from Cuatrecasas-, but which have not led to a larger than usual increase in the number of professionals. “As always, maintaining our essence and our culture, in which cohesion between partners, proximity and the personal element are key, continues to be an inalienable principle along the way,” he explains.
In addition to its financial success, the firm highlighted initiatives launched in 2023 to enhance productivity, efficiency, and professional care. Looking ahead to 2024, Erlaiz affirmed plans to undertake important technological projects while maintaining focus on positioning the firm as the Iberian reference point and strengthening its international role, particularly in the most relevant jurisdictions.
Read full article
El Confidencial |Cinco Días |Expansión
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo is the first major Spanish law firm to present results. In 2023, under the leadership of Íñigo Erlaiz, the firm once again surpassed its historical turnover ceiling, recording global revenues of 92.86 million euros, marking a substantial increase of 10.8% compared to the previous year. In Spain, the firm reached 83.85 million euros, representing an impressive growth of 11.6%. The firm attributes these remarkable results to several factors, including the growth experienced in transactional areas and other significant circumstances, such as the successful completion of major transactions like Zegona’s acquisition of Vodafone Spain, the restructuring of Celsa, and the takeover bid for OPDenergy.
With close to 93 million euros in revenue, marking yet another year of double-digit growth—following a 10% growth in 2022—Gómez-Acebo is edging closer to the 100 million euro milestone. Achieving this would align the firm with the legal areas of the Big Four and Pérez-Llorca, with KPMG lawyers closing the gap at 112.77 million euros, according to last year’s figures. The firm highlights not only the exceptional performance of its transactional teams but also the “very good performance” across its other practice areas, including Litigation, Public, Tax, Labour, Industrial Property, Intellectual Property, and New Technologies, all of which experienced growth of over 10%. Despite commendable performances across all offices, the majority of Gómez-Acebo’s turnover remains concentrated in Madrid, accounting for two-thirds of the total. The firm also underscores the growth potential of its Lisbon office, which it plans to bolster in 2024 through strategic hires announced in recent weeks. Furthermore, it notes the “growing weight” of business originating in the Latin American region, with a turnover increase of more than 50%.
Íñigo Erlaiz, managing partner of Gómez-Acebo & Pombo, has stated that they are “proud” of the results obtained “because it is a very balanced and transversal growth”. The firm’s objective, he continues, “is to be leaders in all practice areas” and, although “the growth in itself is not important, it is relevant to the extent that it reflects progress in the direction of improving the positioning set by the firm”. Erlaiz also pointed out significant improvements in other indicators, such as price per hour or turnover per lawyer, driven by the nature of matters the firm has undertaken. “It is a quiet, healthy and very orderly growth”, says GómezAcebo’s managing partner, who recalled that they have made “significant additions” -such as those reported by El Confidencial of former Linklaters Alexander Kolb or Andrew Ward, from Cuatrecasas-, but which have not led to a larger than usual increase in the number of professionals. “As always, maintaining our essence and our culture, in which cohesion between partners, proximity and the personal element are key, continues to be an inalienable principle along the way,” he explains.
In addition to its financial success, the firm highlighted initiatives launched in 2023 to enhance productivity, efficiency, and professional care. Looking ahead to 2024, Erlaiz affirmed plans to undertake important technological projects while maintaining focus on positioning the firm as the Iberian reference point and strengthening its international role, particularly in the most relevant jurisdictions.
Read full article
El Confidencial |Cinco Días |Expansión
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Compensation for ‘loss of chance’ to reorganise the company had the banks fulfilled their financing commitments (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment no. 1944/2025 of 23 December)
The Supreme Court applies compensation for loss of chance a second time outside the scope of healthcare liability and goes so far as to compensate cases that would have otherwise remained uncompensated.
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
European reform of the sustainability reporting regime under Directive (EU) 2026/470: consequences of its non-transposition into domestic law
Directive (EU) 2026/470 (Omnibus I) has been published, limiting the obligation to prepare a sustainability report to public-interest entities with more than 1,000 employees and a net turnover of more than €450 million during the preceding financial year, as well as to parent companies of a large group that exceed these figures on a consolidated basis. The Directive amends the audit directive, the accounting directive, the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD) and the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD).
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
Uncertificated share pledge creation, enforceability and avoidance (Supreme Court Judgment no.183/2026 of 10 February)
In Judgment no. 183/2026, of 10 February, the Supreme Court analysed the requirements for the validity and enforceability of an uncertificated registered share pledge and examined the conditions for its avoidance in the context of insolvency proceedings.
PUBLICATION
One week ago
The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the "event giving rise to the infringement" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis
This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant—unduly—the burden of proving the specifics of national law.
PUBLICATION
03 Mar, 2026
Legal doctrine of the UPC’s Court of Appeal on the patent invalidity defence: is the way in which the ‘long arm’ is applied compatible with the UPC's own Rules of Procedure?
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court has ruled that a patent invalidity defence cannot be raised before the Unified Patent Court, with only a counterclaim being possible. This calls into question the way in which the ‘long arm’ is being applied with regard to European patents validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), whether or not they are members of the European Union, since no counterclaim for revocation or plea of invalidity as a defence can be filed or raised with regard to such patents. This raises significant doubts about the compatibility of how the ‘long arm’ is applied in the Unified Patent Court system, given its own Rules of Procedure.
PUBLICATION
26 Feb, 2026
A restructuring plan sanctioned in England and Wales that modifies debt subject to German law has no effect in Germany
Recognition of UK restructuring plans remains a contentious issue in the European Union. This decision by the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court is controversial, but it raises questions about the consequences of the application of the rule in Gibbs by the courts of England and Wales in this context.
PUBLICATION
26 Feb, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 47
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
23 Feb, 2026
Irregularities in public sector staffing. Jurisdiction and/or substantive law
When a serious irregularity is found in administrative contracts owing to their employment character, jurisdiction lies with the employment branch of the court system. However, if the administrative route is not outside the scope of the law, jurisdiction lies with the judicial review branch of the court system.
PUBLICATION
17 Feb, 2026
Squeeze-out of minority shareholders following successful mandatory takeover bid: rebuttable presumption of fair consideration
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber), in its judgment of 27 November 2025 (Case C-567/24, Svema Trade), concerning the equitable price in a squeeze-out requiring minority shareholders to sell their shares to an offeror who, following a mandatory takeover bid, has acquired more than 90% of the capital carrying voting rights in the company subject of the takeover bid, states that the presumption that the price offered in the bid, in the context of such a squeeze-out of holders of securities, is equitable is rebuttable.