Go back to News
NEWS
The who’s who of law firms’ financial regulatory departments: Gómez-Acebo & Pombo | FundsPeople
In this article, FundsPeople discusses the who’s who of law firms’ financial regulatory departments. This time they present the Gómez-Acebo & Pombo team, headed by Ana Martínez-Pina and composed by Santiago Gómez Acebo, Valentina Rodríguez, José Francisco Canalejas, Cristina Esteban, Cecilia Herreros and Fernando Igartua in New York.
Meet all the team that is part of the department in the full article.
Meet all the team that is part of the department in the full article.
Press contact

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Prohibition of arbitration in the single energy market
The Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty gives the force and effect of law to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, according to which Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty does not and could not apply as a legal basis for intra-EU arbitration proceedings as a mechanism for the settlement of disputes between a contracting State and an investor of another contracting State.
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Pharma & Healthcare No. 45
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
The Unified Patent Court grants interim relief regarding a European patent validated in Spain: critical considerations
The Decision of the Hamburg Local Division of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court dated 14 August 2025 grants interim relief because it claims jurisdiction to hear the substance of the matter (both the infringement of the unitary patent in the States party to the UPC Agreement and the Spanish validation of the European patent on which the unitary patent is based). To this end, the court offers a series of observations on its international jurisdiction, not all of which are accurate.
PUBLICATION
15 Sep, 2025
The Unified Patent Court takes jurisdiction to hear a claim concerning the infringement of the UK national part of a European patent, even when the validity of the patent is being disputed
In a decision dated 18 July 2025, the Mannheim Division of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court took jurisdiction to hear a claim filed against three companies domiciled in Germany for infringement of a classic European patent with effect in Germany and the United Kingdom. The court's jurisdiction to hear the infringement of the UK national part of European patents is not affected by the fact that the validity of the patent is disputed by the defendants. However, this conclusion does not apply to Spanish national parts of European patents.
PUBLICATION
02 Sep, 2025
Property Transfer Tax in assignment of promissory contracts to sell real estate in Portugal
This article analyses situations which, although they do not involve the transfer of property ownership, are legally treated as equivalent to a sale and are subject to Transfer Tax in Portugal.
PUBLICATION
01 Sep, 2025
Denomination of a plant variety and descriptive use of a third-party trade mark
There is no doubt that the registered name of a plant variety may be used by anyone who markets plant material of that variety. However, in this specific case, the Supreme Court's statement that “the term ‘Persimmon’ was used by the defendant to identify a specific variety of caqui” is noteworthy.
PUBLICATION
05 Aug, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 27
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
30 Jul, 2025
Absolute prohibitions on pharmacy advertising are contrary to EU law
In its judgment of 19 June 2025 (European Commission v Republic of Poland, C‑200/24, ECLI:EU:C:2025:459), the Court of Justice has held that the introduction by national legislation of a total prohibition on advertising for pharmacies infringes European Union law.
PUBLICATION
29 Jul, 2025
Payment contribution between joint and several co-debtors party to an illegal contract
It is unclear whether this doctrine will endure, but the Supreme Court has ruled that a joint and several co-debtor who pays has a right of recourse for the amount paid, even if the joint and several liability arose from an illegal contract.