icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
Cerrar buscador
icon
Volver a News
NOTICIA

GA_P advises Diaphanum on an MBO with the entry of Kartesia into its share capital

icon 6 de May, 2026

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Diaphanum, an independent financial advisory firm in Spain, on a management buyout (MBO) transaction involving the entry of Kartesia, a European fund specialising in flexible capital solutions, into its shareholding structure.

The transaction strengthens Diaphanum’s strategic project, which reshapes its shareholding structure to facilitate generational succession, and entails the incorporation of Kartesia as a new financial partner in the company’s share capital.

The team advising on the transaction was led by David González, Clara Rivero, Carlota Mazzuchelli and Pablo Armero, partners and associates from the Corporate practice; Ana Martínez-Pina and Carlos de la Luna, partner and associate from Banking and Finance; Javier Vinuesa and Rocío Arias, partner and counsel from Tax; together with Jesús Tallos and Diego Rizo, associates from the Labour practice.

Abogado mencionado

David González – Partner

Clara Rivero – Partner

Ver todos los abogadosicon
Ver menos abogadosicon
Tipología

Deal

Áreas y sectores

Corporate and M&A

Banking and Finance

Tax

Employment

More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

News icon Publications icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
PUBLICACIÓN
CJEU requires actual neutralisation of tax discrimination against non-resident collective investment schemes or, where there is tax transparency, against their unitholders
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled in response to the Supreme Court that imposing a heavier tax burden on U.S. regulated investment companies than on resident collective investment schemes constitutes a restriction on the free movement of capital. Although such a restriction may be neutralised by the applicable double taxation treaty, that neutralisation must not be a merely theoretical possibility but must actually and fully be implemented, including with respect to the unitholders.
icon ¡NUEVO!
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
icon 23 Sep, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Social security deregistration over the weekend or on a non-working day to re-register on the next working day may be exempt from penalties
Employees who are deregistered over the weekend or on a non-working day and re-registered on the following working day do not engage in any conduct classified as a violation under employment penalty rules, although the employer’s conduct may, where applicable, be subject to liability of a different nature.
icon 22 Sep, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
icon 18 Sep, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Emails sent by a company to its staff during collective bargaining do not always violate freedom of association
Emails sent by a company to its staff during a negotiation process do not, in and of themselves, constitute anti-union interference or unlawful pressure, provided they fall within the scope of the company’s freedom of expression and the legitimate defence of its business interests.
icon 11 Sep, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
icon 31 Jul, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.
icon 08 Jul, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Conclusions on the abuse of temporary public sector employment: finding a balance between domestic laws and EU law
icon 15 Jun, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
The “serious risk” of financial assistance (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment of 5 May 2026)
This paper critically analyses the Supreme Court ruling of 5May 2026, which applies the prohibition on financial assistance to a case involving the sale of treasury shares with deferred payment to the shareholders of the assisting company.
icon 09 Jun, 2026
icon icon