icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
Cerrar buscador
icon
Volver a News
NOTICIA

GA_P advises Grupo ESP on the court approval of its Restructuring Plan

icon 19 de January, 2026

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Grupo ESP on the approval and court homologation of its Restructuring Plan. Grupo ESP is one of the leading players in the land transport sector, with a strong presence across the Mediterranean arc and subsidiaries in Europe and North Africa.

The judgment homologating the Restructuring Plan, handed down on 9 January 2026, strengthens the continuity of the project led by its management team and consolidates Grupo ESP’s positioning and growth strategy in the land transport sector.

The GA_P team was composed of Paula Zarzalejos and Jorge Martín, partners in the Banking & Finance and Corporate teams; José Antonio Gómez Calafat and Miguel Ángel Melero, counsels in the Litigation & Arbitration and Corporate teams; and associates Mónica Contreras, Cecilia Herreros, Gema Bo, Patricia Pérez, Sergio Gómez, María Gabilondo, Covadonga Luján de Frías and Gemma Serra from the Banking & Finance, Litigation & Arbitration and Corporate teams.

Abogado mencionado

Paula Zarzalejos – Partner

Jorge Martín – Partner

Ver todos los abogadosicon
Ver menos abogadosicon
Tipología

Deal

Áreas y sectores

Corporate and M&A

Banking and Finance

Litigation and Arbitration

More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

News icon Publications icon
icon
icon
icon
icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
icon 23 Sep, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
icon 18 Sep, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
icon 31 Jul, 2026
icon icon
Competition Blog
Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards in Portugal – GAR Know-How Guide
Desafiar e executar sentenças arbitrais em Portugal – Guia GAR Know-How
icon 17 Jul, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.
icon 08 Jul, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
On the exclusion of “financial instruments” from consumer protection provisions for the purposes of applicable law
For the purposes of Article 6 of Rome I, the provisions of a contract defining the terms on which a professional receives or executes a CFD-related order are not covered by the exception provided for in Article 6(4)(d).
icon 03 Jul, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Public policy considerations in the recognition of foreign arbitral awards settling consumer disputes
Judicial review may extend to the substantive invalidity of the arbitration agreement because it conflicts with mandatory domestic rules — as well as those of the European Union — on consumer protection and, consequently, the concept of public policy encompasses both procedural and substantive public policy.
icon 01 Jul, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
Limitation period, extinguishment period, ADR, time window, limitation period, extinguishment period, ADR (a)
Article 7 of Act 1/2025 contains two references to time limits which appear to set out two different rules regarding limitation periods. However, Article 7(3) is not a rule on limitation periods.
icon 26 Jun, 2026
icon icon
PUBLICACIÓN
An insurer may be sued by way of a direct action under Spanish law even if the law governing the insurance contract does not allow such an action
The Supreme Court clarifies the rules governing direct actions in international cases and the limits of the law governing insurance contracts
icon 18 Jun, 2026
icon icon