Volver a News
NOTICIA
GA_P advises Appspace on the acquisition of Beezy Europe
12 de November, 2021
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Appspace Inc, a leading US technology company, on the acquisition of Beezy Inc’s Spanish subsidiary, Beezy Europe S.L.
Appspace develops software platforms specialising in digital signage, enterprise video and content management in the workplace. Beezy offers digital solutions to companies in the automation of processes and connectivity in work environments.
The GA_P team was formed by Mónica Weimann, Cristina Sánchez Weickgenannt, Irene Carreño Uría and Mónica Ojeda, partner, associates and trainee in the Corporate department, Bárbara Sáinz, Isabel Bandín and Mercedes Ferrer, associates in the Intellectual Property department, Delia Castaños, Laura Castillo and Silvana Zarzar, associates and trainee in the Labour department, Rocío Arias, associate in the Tax department and Juan Ferreras, associate in the Banking department.
Appspace develops software platforms specialising in digital signage, enterprise video and content management in the workplace. Beezy offers digital solutions to companies in the automation of processes and connectivity in work environments.
The GA_P team was formed by Mónica Weimann, Cristina Sánchez Weickgenannt, Irene Carreño Uría and Mónica Ojeda, partner, associates and trainee in the Corporate department, Bárbara Sáinz, Isabel Bandín and Mercedes Ferrer, associates in the Intellectual Property department, Delia Castaños, Laura Castillo and Silvana Zarzar, associates and trainee in the Labour department, Rocío Arias, associate in the Tax department and Juan Ferreras, associate in the Banking department.
Abogado mencionado
Monica Weimann – Partner
Cristina Sánchez Weickgenannt – Senior associate
Ver todos los abogados
Ver menos abogados
Tipología
Deal
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
01 Oct, 2026 
PUBLICACIÓN
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
23 Sep, 2026 
PUBLICACIÓN
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
31 Jul, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
28 Jul, 2026
Derogations from the principle of supervision in the home Member State in respect of information society services and control over content by means of an algorithm
The Court (Grand Chamber) defines the scope of derogations from the principle of supervision in the home Member State for information society services on grounds of public policy, security and safety, clarifying the distinction between general prohibitions and individualized measures directed at specific providers. It also provides important criteria regarding the liability of digital platforms, holding that control exercised by means of algorithms may preclude the application of the exemption from liability provided for data hosting services.
28 Jul, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
08 Jul, 2026
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.
08 Jul, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
09 Jun, 2026
The “serious risk” of financial assistance (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment of 5 May 2026)
This paper critically analyses the Supreme Court ruling of 5May 2026, which applies the prohibition on financial assistance to a case involving the sale of treasury shares with deferred payment to the shareholders of the assisting company.
09 Jun, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
28 May, 2026
Voluntary takeover bids and squeeze-outs
The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026 (Korfin and Sempiola v Slovnaft, Case C-225/25) clarifies the concept of a takeover bid for the purposes of Article 2 of the 2004 Takeover Bids Directive, such that an offer made to the holders of securities of a company with a view to acquiring all or some of those securities does not fall within the concept of a takeover bid where it is made by an offeror who already controls the offeree company. Consequently, based on that court’s interpretation of the Directive’s provisions, there is no right of squeeze-out in such voluntary takeover bids.
28 May, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
18 May, 2026
Use as pastiche of another person's work or rendition protected by copyright
This paper examines the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 April 2026, Pelham (C-590/23, ECLI:EU:C:2026:290), which interprets the exception for pastiche contained in Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.
18 May, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
18 May, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 30
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
18 May, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
30 Apr, 2026
New customer service and telemarketing numbers
The State Secretariat for Telecommunications and Digital Infrastructures has published, on 14 April 2016, two decisions: one allocating public numbering resources to customer service and laying down the general terms of use thereof, and the other allocating public numbering resources to telemarketing and laying down the general terms of use thereof.
30 Apr, 2026