Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises EBN Banco de Negocios on the constitution of the fund for Pensium’s bond programme
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised EBN Banco on the incorporation of the investment fund for Pensium’s bond programme.
On Thursday 29th June Pensium has registered a EUR 200 million securitisation bond programme in the Mercado Alternativo de Renta Fija (MARF) in order to finance its activity and growth.
EBN Titulización participates as a registered advisor in the MARF and is the management company of the securitisation fund, while EBN Banco de Negocios will be the placement entity of the bonds and the Firm has acted as legal advisor in the constitution of the fund.
The GA_P team was formed by Guillermo Guerra, partner of the Commercial Law department, Fernando Herrero and Irene Medina de Alba, partner and associate of the Banking and Finance department.
Read the full aticle
On Thursday 29th June Pensium has registered a EUR 200 million securitisation bond programme in the Mercado Alternativo de Renta Fija (MARF) in order to finance its activity and growth.
EBN Titulización participates as a registered advisor in the MARF and is the management company of the securitisation fund, while EBN Banco de Negocios will be the placement entity of the bonds and the Firm has acted as legal advisor in the constitution of the fund.
The GA_P team was formed by Guillermo Guerra, partner of the Commercial Law department, Fernando Herrero and Irene Medina de Alba, partner and associate of the Banking and Finance department.
Read the full aticle
Lawyer mentioned
Guillermo Guerra – Partner
Fernando Herrero – Partner
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
One week ago
Does Article 34 of the Spanish Land Registration Act (re bona fide purchasers) cure a mortgage loan in breach of the prohibition on financial assistance?
In Judgment no. 1469/2026 of 22 September, the Supreme Court states, unequivocally, that Article 34 LH (re bona fide purchasers) cures the mortgage loan in breach of the prohibition on assistance. However, the correct answer is the opposite, even though the prohibited assistance is not an ‘event recorded in the Land Registry’.
PUBLICATION
03 Nov, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 32
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
28 Oct, 2026
Public access to personal details of minority shareholders in a company limited by shares (CJEU, First Chamber, 3 September 2026; Case C-798/24 [Jautiva])
The Court of Justice of the European Union, in a reference for a preliminary ruling, has examined whether EU law precludes national legislation requiring public disclosure of personal data of shareholders (including minority shareholders) of a public limited company when access to such data is not subject to any requirement, such as proof of a legitimate interest.
PUBLICATION
16 Oct, 2026
Consequences of the contractual link between individual bank loans taken out by commonhold unit-holders and restoration work agreed between the commonhold association and a third party
Supreme Court Judgment no. 919/2016 of 16 June is groundbreaking in two respects: first, in holding that unit-holders are parties to a contract between the commonhold association and a third party; and second, in holding that this contract is linked to the loan agreements concluded by a bank with said unit-holders.
PUBLICATION
14 Oct, 2026
The business judgment rule in a cooperative’s purchase of a financial product that ultimately fails
The first ruling to actually apply the business judgment rule in the determination of a claim in relation to liability.
PUBLICATION
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
PUBLICATION
18 Sep, 2026
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
PUBLICATION
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
08 Jul, 2026
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.