Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Impact Partners on Top Doctors Series B financing round
14 of October, 2021
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Impact Partners on its investment in Top Doctors. The Series B financing round, led by Impact Partners and in which the Institut Català de Finances (ICF) also participated, amounted to €11.2 million.
Top Doctors is a startup that offers a digital tool that allows users to access more than 90,000 experts in 50 medical specialties, while providing healthcare professionals with telemedicine solutions, online presence and brand image. The company expects to close the year with a turnover of 16 million euros, 30% more than in 2020. The capital increase will allow the company to consolidate its medical platform in the countries where it already operates in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.
The GA_P team was formed by Álvaro Mateo and Rocío García de Oteyza, partner and associate in the Corporate area.
See complete article in CincoDías
Top Doctors is a startup that offers a digital tool that allows users to access more than 90,000 experts in 50 medical specialties, while providing healthcare professionals with telemedicine solutions, online presence and brand image. The company expects to close the year with a turnover of 16 million euros, 30% more than in 2020. The capital increase will allow the company to consolidate its medical platform in the countries where it already operates in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.
The GA_P team was formed by Álvaro Mateo and Rocío García de Oteyza, partner and associate in the Corporate area.
See complete article in CincoDías
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
2 days ago 
PUBLICATION
Pharma & Healthcare No. 40
25 Sep, 2024 
PUBLICATION
Inside Information and Quarterly Financial Statements: CNMV Communication of 13 October 2021
The CNMV notes in this communication that, although there are no closed periods in respect of the voluntary publication by issuers of the quarterly financial report, this report may contain inside information, in which case the Market Abuse Regulation applies
18 Oct, 2021
PUBLICATION
Administrative liability of the members of a listed company’s audit committee for serious errors or inaccuracies in the audited annual accounts
The Supreme Court's judgment of 8 October 2020 confirms the administrative liability of Audit Committee members for the inaccuracy or lack of veracity of consolidated annual accounts that have been externally audited
13 Nov, 2020
PUBLICATION
Life Sciences Newsletter No. 9
OJ L 115 of 4 May 2018 publishes Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/669 of 16 April 2018 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R0669&from=EN
01 Aug, 2018
PUBLICATION
Publicidad de medicamentos, ficha técnica y menciones distintas de las indicaciones terapéuticas
Al hilo de la Sentencia núm. 186/2018 de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Sección 15.ª) se examina tanto la necesidad de que la publicidad de los medicamentos se ajuste a la ficha técnica como la posibilidad de incluir en el mensaje publicitario menciones distintas de las indicaciones terapéuticas del medicamento.
16 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
Current Legislation No. 24
GA_P’s Current Legislation digests seek to provide an overview of the main legal issues of interest to our readers, clients and lawyers in a format that combines three elements: topicality, clarity and quality. Topicality in the information and in the selection of matters discussed; clarity in laying the foregoing in a concise and intelligible manner rather than...
10 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
Payment periods disallowed under the Late Commercial Payments Act: inappropriate voidness
We are accustomed to hearing the assertion that a bilaterally agreed clause contravening the statutory rule setting a time limit for commercial payments is void ab initio. But is this case when it is the supplier who has the bargaining power? And, in general, does such an assertion make sense?
05 Jul, 2018