Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Impact Partners on Top Doctors Series B financing round
14 October, 2021
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Impact Partners on its investment in Top Doctors. The Series B financing round, led by Impact Partners and in which the Institut Català de Finances (ICF) also participated, amounted to €11.2 million.
Top Doctors is a startup that offers a digital tool that allows users to access more than 90,000 experts in 50 medical specialties, while providing healthcare professionals with telemedicine solutions, online presence and brand image. The company expects to close the year with a turnover of 16 million euros, 30% more than in 2020. The capital increase will allow the company to consolidate its medical platform in the countries where it already operates in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.
The GA_P team was formed by Álvaro Mateo and Rocío García de Oteyza, partner and associate in the Corporate area.
See complete article in CincoDías
Top Doctors is a startup that offers a digital tool that allows users to access more than 90,000 experts in 50 medical specialties, while providing healthcare professionals with telemedicine solutions, online presence and brand image. The company expects to close the year with a turnover of 16 million euros, 30% more than in 2020. The capital increase will allow the company to consolidate its medical platform in the countries where it already operates in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.
The GA_P team was formed by Álvaro Mateo and Rocío García de Oteyza, partner and associate in the Corporate area.
See complete article in CincoDías
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
09 Apr, 2026 
PUBLICATION
3 days ago
The 28th Corporate Regime: the EU Inc.
The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the 28th Regime Corporate Legal Framework – ‘EU Inc.’, dated 18 March 2026, introduces a new form of European private limited company. Originally envisaged for start-ups and scale-ups, it has been decided to allow its adoption by all companies. There is no minimum share capital requirement; shares may have no nominal value and may carry multiple voting rights, among other features. The Commission is expected to approve model articles of association so that a company can be incorporated online in less than forty-eight hours and for less than one hundred euros.
3 days ago 
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
Can a framework agreement lacking an exclusivity or minimum orders clause be discharged by breach?
All cases decided by the Supreme Court and their specific details are discussed. There is no single solution to the problem of terminating a framework supply of services agreement without an exclusivity clause or a minimum purchases obligation.
6 days ago
PUBLICATION
12 Mar, 2026
European reform of the sustainability reporting regime under Directive (EU) 2026/470: consequences of its non-transposition into domestic law
Directive (EU) 2026/470 (Omnibus I) has been published, limiting the obligation to prepare a sustainability report to public-interest entities with more than 1,000 employees and a net turnover of more than €450 million during the preceding financial year, as well as to parent companies of a large group that exceed these figures on a consolidated basis. The Directive amends the audit directive, the accounting directive, the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD) and the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD).
12 Mar, 2026
PUBLICATION
11 Mar, 2026
Uncertificated share pledge creation, enforceability and avoidance (Supreme Court Judgment no.183/2026 of 10 February)
In Judgment no. 183/2026, of 10 February, the Supreme Court analysed the requirements for the validity and enforceability of an uncertificated registered share pledge and examined the conditions for its avoidance in the context of insolvency proceedings.
11 Mar, 2026
PUBLICATION
06 Mar, 2026
The long arm of the Unified Patent Court based on the "event giving rise to the infringement" and considerations on the application of lex loci protectionis
This paper analyses the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025, where the Unified Patent Court (UPC) justifies its jurisdiction on the basis of shipment of products from a UPC territory by company listed as authorized representative in the EC and UK markets as event giving rise to damage. Furthermore, although the applicable law with regard to the infringement of the European patent validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is the national law of those States, with regard to the scope of patent protection, the UPC imposes on the defendant—unduly—the burden of proving the specifics of national law.
06 Mar, 2026
PUBLICATION
03 Mar, 2026
Legal doctrine of the UPC’s Court of Appeal on the patent invalidity defence: is the way in which the ‘long arm’ is applied compatible with the UPC's own Rules of Procedure?
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court has ruled that a patent invalidity defence cannot be raised before the Unified Patent Court, with only a counterclaim being possible. This calls into question the way in which the ‘long arm’ is being applied with regard to European patents validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), whether or not they are members of the European Union, since no counterclaim for revocation or plea of invalidity as a defence can be filed or raised with regard to such patents. This raises significant doubts about the compatibility of how the ‘long arm’ is applied in the Unified Patent Court system, given its own Rules of Procedure.
03 Mar, 2026
PUBLICATION
26 Feb, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 47
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
26 Feb, 2026
PUBLICATION
09 Feb, 2026
Notarial enforcement of pledges. Is Article 1872 of the Civil Code mandatory? In what sense?
The clause agreed upon must comply, for greater certainty, with the provisions of the new judicial enforcement procedure. It will be necessary to agree on an appraised value, which is not required in Article 1872 CC, because otherwise the award would be similar to a ‘forfeiture proviso’ (pactum commissorium), which the Civil Code neutralised with the drastic imposition of extinguishment of the debt in its entirety.
09 Feb, 2026
PUBLICATION
06 Feb, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 29
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
06 Feb, 2026