Go back to News
NEWS
Guadalupe Díaz – Súnico joins GA_P as Tax Partner
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has incorporated Guadalupe Díaz-Súnico as a new Tax partner in the Barcelona office.
Before joining the Firm, Guadalupe was managing partner of the Finance and Tax Department for Madrid and Barcelona at Lener, a firm she joined in 2019, after 15 years at Cuatrecasas. She specialises in advising family businesses and private clients, with a particular focus on international clients, especially in Latin America. During her professional career, she has advised foreign private clients on their relocation to Spain, on the structuring of their assets and on the review of their existing structures in order to organise them efficiently and plan their generational transmission via donations or succession.
She is recognised by the Private Client Global Elite directory as one of the best private wealth lawyers of reference, a mention that is also included in the Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2021.
Guadalupe is a member of organisations such as the International Fiscal Association (IFA), the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) and vice-president of the tax section of the International Association of Young Lawyers (AIJA).
With this incorporation, the Firm adds a new partner to the recent internal promotions of Paula Zarzalejos and Josep Ortiz, in the Public and Regulatory team, and the recent incorporation of Carlos de la Torre in the Labour team.
Read the full article in El Confidencial.
Before joining the Firm, Guadalupe was managing partner of the Finance and Tax Department for Madrid and Barcelona at Lener, a firm she joined in 2019, after 15 years at Cuatrecasas. She specialises in advising family businesses and private clients, with a particular focus on international clients, especially in Latin America. During her professional career, she has advised foreign private clients on their relocation to Spain, on the structuring of their assets and on the review of their existing structures in order to organise them efficiently and plan their generational transmission via donations or succession.
She is recognised by the Private Client Global Elite directory as one of the best private wealth lawyers of reference, a mention that is also included in the Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2021.
Guadalupe is a member of organisations such as the International Fiscal Association (IFA), the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) and vice-president of the tax section of the International Association of Young Lawyers (AIJA).
With this incorporation, the Firm adds a new partner to the recent internal promotions of Paula Zarzalejos and Josep Ortiz, in the Public and Regulatory team, and the recent incorporation of Carlos de la Torre in the Labour team.
Read the full article in El Confidencial.
Press contact

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
3 days ago
A good transposition of the Women on Boards Directive
Ireland has incorporated the mandatory presence of 40% of female non-executive directors on the boards of listed companies as of 30 June 2026, by amending the Companies Act 2014. Unlike the legislation in Spain, the percentage has been limited to this class of directors.
PUBLICATION
3 days ago
The Court of Justice upholds the annulment of the European Commission's third decision on the scheme for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill
La Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de 26 de junio del 2025 declara que las dos primeras decisiones de la Comisión Europea sobre la incompatibilidad con las normas sobre ayudas estatales del régimen de amortización fiscal del fondo de comercio financiero generaron confianza legítima sobre el alcance y límites de la obligación de recuperación, incluyendo dentro de su alcance las adquisiciones directas e indirectas de participaciones en empresas extranjeras. Por tanto, no cabe la recuperación retroactiva de las ayudas relacionadas con adquisiciones indirectas cubiertas por las dos primeras decisiones, por lo que debe procederse a su devolución junto con los intereses de demora.
PUBLICATION
3 days ago
Offsetting employment claims: can a company offset them unilaterally?
If a collective action is brought to challenge the unilateral conduct of a company in the offsetting of salary claims through a payroll deduction, the amount of the debt and the existence of quantitative discrepancies must necessarily be questioned in order to be able to assess whether or not there is legal offsetting on the part of the employer. Only by admitting that the debt is a liquidated amount that is due and payable will the employer - or the employee, as the case may be - be able to offset the debt, but if the debt is not disputed, the way is open for the offsetting of wage claims.
PUBLICATION
09 Jul, 2025
Once again on the obligations assumed by the signers of a "strong" comfort letter
PUBLICATION
07 Jul, 2025
Treatment within insolvency proceedings of claims arising from post-composition clawbacks
In Judgment no. 519/2025 of 1 April, the Supreme Court tackles the treatment to be given within insolvency proceedings to a claim acknowledged by way of court-ordered clawback (avoidance) prior to court approval of a composition.
PUBLICATION
02 Jul, 2025
Pharma & Healthcare No. 44
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
30 Jun, 2025
Main changes introduced by RDL 7/2025 to the milestone system applied in the processing of renewable energy generation projects
Royal Decree-law 7/2025 introduces new regulations which modify and extend the milestone system applied in the processing of renewable energy generation projects
PUBLICATION
30 Jun, 2025
Main changes introduced by RDL 7/2025 regarding electricity storage projects
Royal Decree-law 7/2025 introduces regulatory changes to the processing and deployment of electricity storage projects
PUBLICATION
19 Jun, 2025
Company resolutions reached with invalid votes
Although Article 204(3)(d) places them on the same level, the erroneous counting of votes and the counting of invalid votes are very different, given that the latter requires judicial balancing.