Go back to News
NEWS
Individual ranking: Álvaro Mateo and David González, in the TOP5 by number of transactions | El Confidencial
7 of April, 2022
Our Corporate and Commercial partners, Álvaro Mateo and David González, have been recognised in the top 5 of TTR’s ranking by number of transactions in the first quarter. Álvaro leads the ranking while David occupies the fifth position.
Read full article
Read full article
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
¡NEW! 
PUBLICATION
Inside Information and Quarterly Financial Statements: CNMV Communication of 13 October 2021
The CNMV notes in this communication that, although there are no closed periods in respect of the voluntary publication by issuers of the quarterly financial report, this report may contain inside information, in which case the Market Abuse Regulation applies
18 Oct, 2021 
PUBLICATION
Administrative liability of the members of a listed company’s audit committee for serious errors or inaccuracies in the audited annual accounts
The Supreme Court's judgment of 8 October 2020 confirms the administrative liability of Audit Committee members for the inaccuracy or lack of veracity of consolidated annual accounts that have been externally audited
13 Nov, 2020
PUBLICATION
Current Legislation No. 24
GA_P’s Current Legislation digests seek to provide an overview of the main legal issues of interest to our readers, clients and lawyers in a format that combines three elements: topicality, clarity and quality. Topicality in the information and in the selection of matters discussed; clarity in laying the foregoing in a concise and intelligible manner rather than...
10 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
Payment periods disallowed under the Late Commercial Payments Act: inappropriate voidness
We are accustomed to hearing the assertion that a bilaterally agreed clause contravening the statutory rule setting a time limit for commercial payments is void ab initio. But is this case when it is the supplier who has the bargaining power? And, in general, does such an assertion make sense?
05 Jul, 2018