Go back to News
NEWS
Javier Vinuesa: about 720 | El Confidencial
28 of January, 2022
Our tax partner, Javier Vinuesa, collaborates in this article of El Confidencial on the increase of regularizations and claims against the State after the European setback to 720. In particular, Javier mentions:
“The ruling collects all the legal grounds that we have alleged in the open proceedings on this issue. First, the TJEU has confirmed that the 720 regulation is contrary to the free movement of capital. This is important, because it implies that the judgment deploys its effects with respect to investments in other Member States, but also with respect to assets located in third States.”
“We appreciate that the TJEU prevents the questioning of statutes of limitations that have already expired. We have had several cases in which unjustified capital gains have been settled with respect to assets where there was no doubt that they had been acquired in prescribed tax periods. This proof to the contrary only existed in the Spanish rule with respect to assets located in Spain, but did not apply to assets located abroad. From now on, the same rules will apply regardless of where the assets are located”.
El Confidencial
“The ruling collects all the legal grounds that we have alleged in the open proceedings on this issue. First, the TJEU has confirmed that the 720 regulation is contrary to the free movement of capital. This is important, because it implies that the judgment deploys its effects with respect to investments in other Member States, but also with respect to assets located in third States.”
“We appreciate that the TJEU prevents the questioning of statutes of limitations that have already expired. We have had several cases in which unjustified capital gains have been settled with respect to assets where there was no doubt that they had been acquired in prescribed tax periods. This proof to the contrary only existed in the Spanish rule with respect to assets located in Spain, but did not apply to assets located abroad. From now on, the same rules will apply regardless of where the assets are located”.
El Confidencial
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
Legal professional privilege as a limit to the duty to cooperate with tax authorities
The Court of Justice confirms, in the context of Directive 2011/16/EU, that legal professional privilege covers client representation and advice and that any restrictions placed on said privilege must respect the rights enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
¡NEW!
PUBLICATION
Mandatory recognition of multiple-vote shares for companies listed on a multilateral trading facility
Directive (EU) 2024/2810 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek admission to trading of their shares on a multilateral trading facility will have to be transposed into Spanish law before 5 December 2026
2 days ago
PUBLICATION
Universal service in telecommunications: guidance for determining when it represents an unfair burden and the adoption of a cost-sharing system is appropriate
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled once again on the financing of the universal telecommunications service: there are no r. to be excluded from the cost-sharing system; the decision based on market competition lies with national regulatory authorities.
3 days ago
PUBLICATION
Social Security Measures to Alleviate the DANA’s Effects
The impact of the DANA (Spanish acronym for a cut-off low pressure system) on economic and employment activity has made it necessary to adopt urgent measures to provide employers and workers with liquidity. Among others, benefits, exemptions, extensions and increases of some Social Security pensions.
6 days ago
PUBLICATION
Fundamental freedoms, intra-group loans and the fight against tax avoidance: the Court of Justice clarifies the Lexel case doctrine
In the Judgment of 4 October 2024, X BV (C-585/22), the Court of Justice clarifies the position adopted in the Lexel case (C-484/19) and concludes that compliance with the arm's length principle does not protect intra-group transactions that do not reflect economic reality from being categorised as a wholly artificial arrangement.
05 Nov, 2024
PUBLICATION
Directive (EU) 2023/2413: the designation of ‘renewables acceleration areas’ in which projects are exempted from an environmental impact assessment
The new Renewable Energy Directive requires Member States to approve plans designating ‘ renewables acceleration areas’. The plans will be subject to strategic environmental assessment, but projects in these areas will be exempted from environmental impact assessment.
05 Nov, 2024
PUBLICATION
Intellectual property, text and data mining and artificial intelligence training
The problem consisting of the use of works and other protected subject matter for the purposes of mining and training of artificial intelligence is analysed in the light of the judgment of the Regional Court of Hamburg of 27 September 2024 (310 O 227/23).
30 Oct, 2024