Go back to News
NEWS
Javier Vinuesa: about 720 | El Confidencial
Our tax partner, Javier Vinuesa, collaborates in this article of El Confidencial on the increase of regularizations and claims against the State after the European setback to 720. In particular, Javier mentions:
“The ruling collects all the legal grounds that we have alleged in the open proceedings on this issue. First, the TJEU has confirmed that the 720 regulation is contrary to the free movement of capital. This is important, because it implies that the judgment deploys its effects with respect to investments in other Member States, but also with respect to assets located in third States.”
“We appreciate that the TJEU prevents the questioning of statutes of limitations that have already expired. We have had several cases in which unjustified capital gains have been settled with respect to assets where there was no doubt that they had been acquired in prescribed tax periods. This proof to the contrary only existed in the Spanish rule with respect to assets located in Spain, but did not apply to assets located abroad. From now on, the same rules will apply regardless of where the assets are located”.
El Confidencial
“The ruling collects all the legal grounds that we have alleged in the open proceedings on this issue. First, the TJEU has confirmed that the 720 regulation is contrary to the free movement of capital. This is important, because it implies that the judgment deploys its effects with respect to investments in other Member States, but also with respect to assets located in third States.”
“We appreciate that the TJEU prevents the questioning of statutes of limitations that have already expired. We have had several cases in which unjustified capital gains have been settled with respect to assets where there was no doubt that they had been acquired in prescribed tax periods. This proof to the contrary only existed in the Spanish rule with respect to assets located in Spain, but did not apply to assets located abroad. From now on, the same rules will apply regardless of where the assets are located”.
El Confidencial
Press contact

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Pharma & Healthcare No. 43
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
Payment period and accrual of late payment interest in public contracts: latest controversial Supreme Court ruling
Supreme Court Judgment no. 5938/2024, which confirms its doctrine on the payment period and the accrual of late payment interest in public contracts, is examined. This doctrine, which establishes a general 60-day period, raises doubts as to its compatibility with Directive 2011/7/EU and with the CJEU’s case law.
PUBLICATION
02 Apr, 2025
Supreme Court judgment on the Campelo wind farm: does it clear the path for wind energy in Galicia?
Supreme Court Judgment no. 316/2025 marks a turning point in the intense litigation surrounding wind energy projects in Galicia. While confirming its doctrine on the public consultation procedure, the Supreme Court clarifies that the fact that several wind farms share evacuation infrastructure does not, in and of itself, establish the existence of a single project for environmental purposes, contrary to what was previously held by the Galician High Court of Justice.
PUBLICATION
01 Apr, 2025
Professional Purchasers of Non-Performing Credit: the new Law is ahead
The content of the Directive on credit servicers and credit purchasers, only of non-performing credit (NPC), has been transposed into Spanish law more than a year late. The Bill introduces the administrative regime for credit servicers and amends, among others, the Consumer Credit Act and the Real Estate Credit Agreements Act.
PUBLICATION
27 Mar, 2025
The notion of ‘pharmacological action’ in the legal concept of medicinal product
A look at the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-589/23, Cassella-med and MCM Klosterfrau, ECLI:EU:C:2025:173.
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
A first ranking mortgage does not prevent a creditor from accelerating loan maturity due to debtor insolvency
If the creditor has a secured claim (even if the debt is covered by the "value of the security", i.e. the claim is in the money), the debtor cannot avoid the effects of the to-term forfeiture by appealing to the existence of that security because the guarantee referred to in Article 1129(1) of the Civil Code (avoiding to-term forfeiture) must then be another additional guarantee.
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
La existencia de una hipoteca de primer rango no impide que el acreedor pueda declarar el vencimiento anticipado del plazo por insolvencia sobrevenida del deudor
Si el acreedor goza de una garantía real para la seguridad de su crédito (incluso si la deuda está cubierta por el «valor de la garantía», es decir, que el crédito está in the money), el deudor no puede evitar los efectos de la pérdida del plazo apelando a la existencia de aquella garantía real porque la garantía a que se refiere el artículo 1129.1.º del Código Civil (evitadora de la pérdida del plazo) deberá ser entonces otra garantía suplementaria.
PUBLICATION
21 Mar, 2025
Tax treatment of exemptions under the Public Service of Justice (Efficiency Measures) Act
Here follows a critical analysis of the changes made by the Public Service of Justice (Efficiency Measures) Act to the regulation of three of the exemptions provided for in Article 7 of the Personal Income Tax Act that seek to favour the implementation and promotion of non-court appropriate dispute resolution procedures.
PUBLICATION
20 Mar, 2025
Use of environmental claims in advertising: the Iberdrola v. Repsol case
Santander Companies Court No. 2 Judgment no. 12/2025 of 21 February, which is not conclusive, is analysed.