Javier Vinuesa talks about Socimis | Expansión

The Court of Justice, in the Stellantis Portugal case, confirms that a transfer pricing adjustment intended to ensure a specific profit margin, even if certain repair or warranty costs are partially taken into account in its calculation, does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that there is an independent supply of services subject to value-added tax. The determining factors are the existence of a legal relationship involving reciprocal consideration and a direct link between the identifiable service and the consideration received.

In this paper we address the controversy that the taxation of Brazilian interest has sparked both during the period when the recast version of the Corporate Income Tax Act was in force and since the Corporate Income Tax Act came into effect. Its possible classification, either as dividends or as interest, has been analysed on several occasions by Spanish courts and tax authority, the latter having recently agreed with its Brazilian counterpart to treat it as “interest” for the purposes of the Spain/Brazil Double Taxation Convention.

Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations

The Supreme Court has established ‘cassational’ doctrine regarding the treatment under value-added tax of intra-group transfers of shares by mixed holding companies. It is confirmed that the intra-group transfer of shares constitutes a financial activity that cannot generally be classified as a management support activity. Likewise, it is acknowledged that an intra-group transfer of shares may not be subject to said tax when it involves the indirect transfer of an independent economic unit, subjecting such exclusion to the circumstances surrounding the transaction.

Whether or not the purchasers of residential apartments and commercial premises take on, by way of subrogation, the planning obligations arising from a land readjustment procedure, has always been a conundrum on account of the economic and social impact that an affirmative answer would have on the end recipients of housing. The Supreme Court has yet to rule on this matter.

The package of tax measures included in Royal Decree-law 7/2026, of 20 March, consists of various incentives in the field of direct taxation of individuals and companies to reduce dependence and promote energy savings and efficiency, electric mobility, and support for self-consumption and investment in renewables. Moreover, it includes a set of extraordinary and temporary measures applicable to energy taxation and indirect taxation aimed at reducing the tax burden on products particularly affected by rising prices. Lastly, certain changes are made to various local taxes.

Although the judgment states that the landlord has three remedies available, in reality he has only one — whether he seeks performance or opts for termination — which is damages.

In its Judgment of 26 February 2026, in Case C-524/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive (EU) 2016/1164, by failing to adopt the statutory, regulatory and administrative provisions necessary to ensure taxpayers’ right to a deduction of the tax paid by controlled foreign companies from the corporate income tax liability of the taxpayer.

The Supreme Court rules that the requirement of having at least one full-time employee for an undertaking engaged in real estate leasing to be regarded as carrying on business may be deemed fulfilled by way of an associated company when such is functionally part and parcel of the business activity of the group of companies as a whole.