Go back to News
NEWS
Overtime, shifts, contracts… The doubts that plague companies about the reduction of working hours | El Economista
Labour relations departments will face challenges in adapting to these new regulations. Borja González Elejabarrieta, labour counsel at the firm, discusses the concerns among his clients about the possible approval of the reduced working hours regulation in Spain in this article in El Economista. Although for now he avoids talking about a “flood” of consultations, given that there is not even “a regulation approved and published in the BOE”. The reform also implies a tougher control of overtime and the associated penalties. Therefore, companies will need to reinforce the control of working time and adapt records to each job in order to comply with current labour regulations.
The labour reform that aims to reduce the working week from 40 to 38.5 hours per week this year, and to 37.5 hours from 1 January 2025, is in a final stage with some uncertainties. In this process, companies are preparing for the changes ahead, which could make for a difficult summer, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The withdrawal of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations (CEOE) and the Spanish Confederation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (Cepyme) from the negotiations is due to political rigidity around reaching 37.5 hours by 2025.
Companies are preparing to adapt to this new working time, although it should be noted that an official regulation has not yet been published. In this context, companies are also considering possible changes in annual overtime due to this new regulation, which will lead to higher costs, especially for SMEs. Consultations focus on adjusting working shifts to comply with the new requirements.
The labour reform that aims to reduce the working week from 40 to 38.5 hours per week this year, and to 37.5 hours from 1 January 2025, is in a final stage with some uncertainties. In this process, companies are preparing for the changes ahead, which could make for a difficult summer, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The withdrawal of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations (CEOE) and the Spanish Confederation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (Cepyme) from the negotiations is due to political rigidity around reaching 37.5 hours by 2025.
Companies are preparing to adapt to this new working time, although it should be noted that an official regulation has not yet been published. In this context, companies are also considering possible changes in annual overtime due to this new regulation, which will lead to higher costs, especially for SMEs. Consultations focus on adjusting working shifts to comply with the new requirements.
Lawyer mentioned
Borja González – Counsel
Areas and sectors
Press contact

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Supreme Court judgment on the Campelo wind farm: does it clear the path for wind energy in Galicia?
Supreme Court Judgment no. 316/2025 marks a turning point in the intense litigation surrounding wind energy projects in Galicia. While confirming its doctrine on the public consultation procedure, the Supreme Court clarifies that the fact that several wind farms share evacuation infrastructure does not, in and of itself, establish the existence of a single project for environmental purposes, contrary to what was previously held by the Galician High Court of Justice.
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Professional Purchasers of Non-Performing Credit: the new Law is ahead
The content of the Directive on credit servicers and credit purchasers, only of non-performing credit (NPC), has been transposed into Spanish law more than a year late. The Bill introduces the administrative regime for credit servicers and amends, among others, the Consumer Credit Act and the Real Estate Credit Agreements Act.
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
The notion of ‘pharmacological action’ in the legal concept of medicinal product
A look at the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-589/23, Cassella-med and MCM Klosterfrau, ECLI:EU:C:2025:173.
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
A first ranking mortgage does not prevent a creditor from accelerating loan maturity due to debtor insolvency
If the creditor has a secured claim (even if the debt is covered by the "value of the security", i.e. the claim is in the money), the debtor cannot avoid the effects of the to-term forfeiture by appealing to the existence of that security because the guarantee referred to in Article 1129(1) of the Civil Code (avoiding to-term forfeiture) must then be another additional guarantee.
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
La existencia de una hipoteca de primer rango no impide que el acreedor pueda declarar el vencimiento anticipado del plazo por insolvencia sobrevenida del deudor
Si el acreedor goza de una garantía real para la seguridad de su crédito (incluso si la deuda está cubierta por el «valor de la garantía», es decir, que el crédito está in the money), el deudor no puede evitar los efectos de la pérdida del plazo apelando a la existencia de aquella garantía real porque la garantía a que se refiere el artículo 1129.1.º del Código Civil (evitadora de la pérdida del plazo) deberá ser entonces otra garantía suplementaria.
PUBLICATION
21 Mar, 2025
Tax treatment of exemptions under the Public Service of Justice (Efficiency Measures) Act
Here follows a critical analysis of the changes made by the Public Service of Justice (Efficiency Measures) Act to the regulation of three of the exemptions provided for in Article 7 of the Personal Income Tax Act that seek to favour the implementation and promotion of non-court appropriate dispute resolution procedures.
PUBLICATION
20 Mar, 2025
Use of environmental claims in advertising: the Iberdrola v. Repsol case
Santander Companies Court No. 2 Judgment no. 12/2025 of 21 February, which is not conclusive, is analysed.
PUBLICATION
14 Mar, 2025
A good ruling on financial assistance: collateral given to secure third-party borrowings is not invalid
This latest Supreme Court ruling on the prohibition of financial assistance in the purchase of shares in the assisting company (assisting as ‘borrower for third party debt’) is to be praised, erasing the bad taste left by the reading of the immediate precedent (Supreme Court Judgment of 20 April 2023, Ezentis) which held an agreement to underwrite the value of the shares sold by the company invalid.
PUBLICATION
12 Mar, 2025
Invalidity of a patent raised as a defence: questions of jurisdiction
The determination of international jurisdiction in respect of the invalidity of a patent raised as a defence varies depending on the State — whether member or not of the European Union — in which such patent was granted.