Go back to News
NEWS
Overtime, shifts, contracts… The doubts that plague companies about the reduction of working hours | El Economista
Labour relations departments will face challenges in adapting to these new regulations. Borja González Elejabarrieta, labour counsel at the firm, discusses the concerns among his clients about the possible approval of the reduced working hours regulation in Spain in this article in El Economista. Although for now he avoids talking about a “flood” of consultations, given that there is not even “a regulation approved and published in the BOE”. The reform also implies a tougher control of overtime and the associated penalties. Therefore, companies will need to reinforce the control of working time and adapt records to each job in order to comply with current labour regulations.
The labour reform that aims to reduce the working week from 40 to 38.5 hours per week this year, and to 37.5 hours from 1 January 2025, is in a final stage with some uncertainties. In this process, companies are preparing for the changes ahead, which could make for a difficult summer, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The withdrawal of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations (CEOE) and the Spanish Confederation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (Cepyme) from the negotiations is due to political rigidity around reaching 37.5 hours by 2025.
Companies are preparing to adapt to this new working time, although it should be noted that an official regulation has not yet been published. In this context, companies are also considering possible changes in annual overtime due to this new regulation, which will lead to higher costs, especially for SMEs. Consultations focus on adjusting working shifts to comply with the new requirements.
The labour reform that aims to reduce the working week from 40 to 38.5 hours per week this year, and to 37.5 hours from 1 January 2025, is in a final stage with some uncertainties. In this process, companies are preparing for the changes ahead, which could make for a difficult summer, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The withdrawal of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations (CEOE) and the Spanish Confederation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (Cepyme) from the negotiations is due to political rigidity around reaching 37.5 hours by 2025.
Companies are preparing to adapt to this new working time, although it should be noted that an official regulation has not yet been published. In this context, companies are also considering possible changes in annual overtime due to this new regulation, which will lead to higher costs, especially for SMEs. Consultations focus on adjusting working shifts to comply with the new requirements.
Lawyer mentioned
Borja González – Counsel
Areas and sectors
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
Tax Litigation
¡NEW!
Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations
Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Use as pastiche of another person's work or rendition protected by copyright
This paper examines the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 April 2026, Pelham (C-590/23, ECLI:EU:C:2026:290), which interprets the exception for pastiche contained in Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 30
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
5 days ago
Supreme Court clarifies VAT treatment of intra-group transfers of shares carried out by mixed holding companies
The Supreme Court has established ‘cassational’ doctrine regarding the treatment under value-added tax of intra-group transfers of shares by mixed holding companies. It is confirmed that the intra-group transfer of shares constitutes a financial activity that cannot generally be classified as a management support activity. Likewise, it is acknowledged that an intra-group transfer of shares may not be subject to said tax when it involves the indirect transfer of an independent economic unit, subjecting such exclusion to the circumstances surrounding the transaction.
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
Supreme Court rules on ‘administrative silence’ in the electricity sector: “public service” or “service of general economic interest”
The Supreme Court judgment of 10 April 2026 characterises the concept of public service under Article 24(1) of Act 39/2015 as an exception to the ‘double silence’ rule, distinguishing it from the concept of service of general economic interest, which applies in liberalized sectors such as that of electricity supply. The Supreme Court thus concludes that in seeking an authorisation to close a combined-cycle power plant, the ‘double silence’ rule applies to the effect of a presumption of approval.
PUBLICATION
30 Apr, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 48
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
30 Apr, 2026
New customer service and telemarketing numbers
The State Secretariat for Telecommunications and Digital Infrastructures has published, on 14 April 2016, two decisions: one allocating public numbering resources to customer service and laying down the general terms of use thereof, and the other allocating public numbering resources to telemarketing and laying down the general terms of use thereof.
PUBLICATION
29 Apr, 2026
Limitation of a patent and the Unified Patent Court’s ‘long arm’
We analyse the problems that arise when a claim is filed with the UPC for infringement of a unitary patent and, at the same time, for infringement of the validation of the basic European patent in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, and the claimant solely limits the unitary patent (because the defendant only files a counterclaim for revocation of the unitary patent with said court, but does not initiate any parallel revocation proceedings with the competent national court against the validations of the basic European patent in States that are not party to said agreement).
PUBLICATION
27 Apr, 2026
Separate restructuring strategies among joint and several co-debtors
The basis for this paper is a slightly modified real-life case, broadened to include all possible forms of plurality of debtors.