Volver a News
NOTICIA
Covid-19 | Statement Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
At Gómez-Acebo & Pombo we have implemented specific measures to help overcome the situation created by Covid- 19 whilst ensuring the safety of our teams and of those people with whom we may have contact, we have adopted different internal protocols, including teleworking for the whole Firm.
Rest assured that our activity continues to uphold the quality of our service, while contributing with the adopted measures to prevent the spread of the virus.
We are at your disposal at all times, and you can get in touch with your usual contact person or with us by e-mail at comunicacion@ga-p.com or at the following office telephone numbers:
Madrid (+34) 91 582 91 00
Barcelona (+34) 93 415 74 00
Bilbao (+34) 94 415 70 15
Brussels +32 (0) 2 231 12 20
Lisbon (+351) 21 340 86 00
New York (+1) 646 736 3075
London +44 (0)20 7329 5407
Valencia (+34) 96 351 38 35
Vigo (+34) 986 44 33 80
We hope that everything will be back to normal soon.
Rest assured that our activity continues to uphold the quality of our service, while contributing with the adopted measures to prevent the spread of the virus.
We are at your disposal at all times, and you can get in touch with your usual contact person or with us by e-mail at comunicacion@ga-p.com or at the following office telephone numbers:
Madrid (+34) 91 582 91 00
Barcelona (+34) 93 415 74 00
Bilbao (+34) 94 415 70 15
Brussels +32 (0) 2 231 12 20
Lisbon (+351) 21 340 86 00
New York (+1) 646 736 3075
London +44 (0)20 7329 5407
Valencia (+34) 96 351 38 35
Vigo (+34) 986 44 33 80
We hope that everything will be back to normal soon.
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
Competition Blog
¡NUEVO!
Private Antitrust Litigation – Lexology Guide
Desafiar e executar sentenças arbitrais em Portugal – Guia GAR Know-How
PUBLICACIÓN
¡NUEVO!
CJEU requires actual neutralisation of tax discrimination against non-resident collective investment schemes or, where there is tax transparency, against their unitholders
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled in response to the Supreme Court that imposing a heavier tax burden on U.S. regulated investment companies than on resident collective investment schemes constitutes a restriction on the free movement of capital. Although such a restriction may be neutralised by the applicable double taxation treaty, that neutralisation must not be a merely theoretical possibility but must actually and fully be implemented, including with respect to the unitholders.
PUBLICACIÓN
Hace 2 días
Ministerial Order TED/966/2026 of 15 September: creation of Spain’s capacity market
The creation of the capacity market will ensure availability of power in the mainland electricity system by paying providers that undertake to make capacity available during periods of stress, thereby ensuring the security of electricity supply.
PUBLICACIÓN
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
PUBLICACIÓN
22 Sep, 2026
Social security deregistration over the weekend or on a non-working day to re-register on the next working day may be exempt from penalties
Employees who are deregistered over the weekend or on a non-working day and re-registered on the following working day do not engage in any conduct classified as a violation under employment penalty rules, although the employer’s conduct may, where applicable, be subject to liability of a different nature.
PUBLICACIÓN
22 Sep, 2026
Air Berlin's insolvency proceedings in Spain and claims arising from employment contracts
The judgment, in line with the guidelines provided by the Court of Justice of the European Union on referral of questions raised in this case, offers interesting insights into the interpretation of the relationship between universal insolvency proceedings and territorial insolvency proceedings.
PUBLICACIÓN
21 Sep, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 50
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICACIÓN
18 Sep, 2026
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
PUBLICACIÓN
15 Sep, 2026
Sale of essential assets without shareholder approval and the enforceability of such violation against third parties
The Supreme Court (Judgment no. 881/2026 of 9 June) has held that Article 234(2) of the Companies Act is applicable by analogy in a case where a company director disposed of essential company assets without the required authorisation from the shareholders in general meeting (Art. 160(f) of the Companies Act).