Volver a News
NOTICIA
GA_P advises FacePhi Biometrics on its new investment agreement with Nice & Green with a maximum value of 20 million euros
18 de December, 2020
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised on the design and implementation of the second equity line, for a maximum amount of 20 million euros, between the Swiss entity Nice & Green and FacePhi Biometría, S.A., a company whose shares are incorporated in BME Growth (formerly MAB). This operation was especially important as, due to its particular legal regime, the company could not delegate the exclusion of pre-emption rights, so the operation was carried out through the issue of warrants and a parachute resolution from the shareholders in General Meeting.
Guillermo Guerra and Jacobo Palanca, partner and lawyer respectively in the Corporate & Commercial Practice Area, advised on the operation.
Guillermo Guerra and Jacobo Palanca, partner and lawyer respectively in the Corporate & Commercial Practice Area, advised on the operation.
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
Hace 2 días 
Competition Blog
¡NUEVO!
Private Antitrust Litigation – Lexology Guide
Desafiar e executar sentenças arbitrais em Portugal – Guia GAR Know-How
¡NUEVO! 
PUBLICACIÓN
¡NUEVO!
CJEU requires actual neutralisation of tax discrimination against non-resident collective investment schemes or, where there is tax transparency, against their unitholders
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled in response to the Supreme Court that imposing a heavier tax burden on U.S. regulated investment companies than on resident collective investment schemes constitutes a restriction on the free movement of capital. Although such a restriction may be neutralised by the applicable double taxation treaty, that neutralisation must not be a merely theoretical possibility but must actually and fully be implemented, including with respect to the unitholders.
¡NUEVO!
PUBLICACIÓN
Hace 2 días
Ministerial Order TED/966/2026 of 15 September: creation of Spain’s capacity market
The creation of the capacity market will ensure availability of power in the mainland electricity system by paying providers that undertake to make capacity available during periods of stress, thereby ensuring the security of electricity supply.
Hace 2 días
PUBLICACIÓN
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
23 Sep, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
22 Sep, 2026
Social security deregistration over the weekend or on a non-working day to re-register on the next working day may be exempt from penalties
Employees who are deregistered over the weekend or on a non-working day and re-registered on the following working day do not engage in any conduct classified as a violation under employment penalty rules, although the employer’s conduct may, where applicable, be subject to liability of a different nature.
22 Sep, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
22 Sep, 2026
Air Berlin's insolvency proceedings in Spain and claims arising from employment contracts
The judgment, in line with the guidelines provided by the Court of Justice of the European Union on referral of questions raised in this case, offers interesting insights into the interpretation of the relationship between universal insolvency proceedings and territorial insolvency proceedings.
22 Sep, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
21 Sep, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 50
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
21 Sep, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
18 Sep, 2026
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
18 Sep, 2026
PUBLICACIÓN
15 Sep, 2026
Sale of essential assets without shareholder approval and the enforceability of such violation against third parties
The Supreme Court (Judgment no. 881/2026 of 9 June) has held that Article 234(2) of the Companies Act is applicable by analogy in a case where a company director disposed of essential company assets without the required authorisation from the shareholders in general meeting (Art. 160(f) of the Companies Act).
15 Sep, 2026