Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Indra on the acquisition of a 9.5% stake in ITP Aero
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Indra Sistemas, S.A., an Ibex-35 listed company, on the acquisition of 9.5% of ITP Aero from the US fund Bain Capital for €175 million.
Indra and ITP Aero have also reached a framework agreement establishing the basis for a strategic technological collaboration with the aim of enhancing their value, leveraging synergies and promoting the joint development of systems and technologies, including developments linked to the future European air combat programme (FCAS) in which Indra is the national industrial leader.
The GA_P team, led by Guillermo Guerra, partner at Commercial, was made up of: David Riopérez, Carolina Posse and Emiliano Moreno, partner and associates of Commercial, Irene Medina, associate of Banking, Carlos Vázquez, partner of Public and Miguel Troncoso, partner of Competition.
Indra and ITP Aero have also reached a framework agreement establishing the basis for a strategic technological collaboration with the aim of enhancing their value, leveraging synergies and promoting the joint development of systems and technologies, including developments linked to the future European air combat programme (FCAS) in which Indra is the national industrial leader.
The GA_P team, led by Guillermo Guerra, partner at Commercial, was made up of: David Riopérez, Carolina Posse and Emiliano Moreno, partner and associates of Commercial, Irene Medina, associate of Banking, Carlos Vázquez, partner of Public and Miguel Troncoso, partner of Competition.
Lawyer mentioned
David Riopérez – Partner
Carolina Posse Van Der Laat – Senior associate
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
3 days ago
Impact on directors of company debts and penalties under a sector-specific rule
We analyse, in short, whether company payment contributions can be included in director liability (to company) claims.
PUBLICATION
09 Oct, 2025
Payment service providers’ rectification of unauthorised or incorrectly executed payment transactions: user obligations
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber), in its judgment of 1 August 2025, case C-665/23, IL v. Veracash SAS, concludes that a payer is deprived of the right to reimbursement of the amount of an unauthorised transaction if he or she delayed in notifying his or her payment service provider of the unauthorised payment transaction, even though he or she did so within 13 months from the debit date. This interpretation of the Payment Services Directive is applicable in Spain (Art. 43 RDL 19/2018) and appears to be retained in the future Regulation on payment services.
PUBLICATION
01 Oct, 2025
Contractual termination by mutual abandonment not claimed by any party?
The risks of applying the doctrine according to which a contract is deemed withdrawn from if neither party to the same appears to want it. Not only is this solution likely to be inconsistent with the parties' claims, but it also wrongly rules out other civil law options the parties could pursue upon dismissal of the action for declaration of termination.
PUBLICATION
30 Sep, 2025
Court of Justice rules that lower courts may disregard decisions of higher courts that violate independence and impartiality
The Court of Justice ruling of 4 September 2025 (C-225/22) has declared that national courts may set aside decisions of higher courts that do not comply with the requirements of independence and impartiality derived from Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
PUBLICATION
25 Sep, 2025
Prohibition of arbitration in the single energy market
The Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty gives the force and effect of law to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, according to which Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty does not and could not apply as a legal basis for intra-EU arbitration proceedings as a mechanism for the settlement of disputes between a contracting State and an investor of another contracting State.
PUBLICATION
25 Sep, 2025
Pharma & Healthcare No. 45
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
15 Sep, 2025
The Unified Patent Court takes jurisdiction to hear a claim concerning the infringement of the UK national part of a European patent, even when the validity of the patent is being disputed
In a decision dated 18 July 2025, the Mannheim Division of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court took jurisdiction to hear a claim filed against three companies domiciled in Germany for infringement of a classic European patent with effect in Germany and the United Kingdom. The court's jurisdiction to hear the infringement of the UK national part of European patents is not affected by the fact that the validity of the patent is disputed by the defendants. However, this conclusion does not apply to Spanish national parts of European patents.
PUBLICATION
05 Aug, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 27
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
15 Jul, 2025
Offsetting employment claims: can a company offset them unilaterally?
If a collective action is brought to challenge the unilateral conduct of a company in the offsetting of salary claims through a payroll deduction, the amount of the debt and the existence of quantitative discrepancies must necessarily be questioned in order to be able to assess whether or not there is legal offsetting on the part of the employer. Only by admitting that the debt is a liquidated amount that is due and payable will the employer - or the employee, as the case may be - be able to offset the debt, but if the debt is not disputed, the way is open for the offsetting of wage claims.