Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Indra on the acquisition of a 9.5% stake in ITP Aero
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Indra Sistemas, S.A., an Ibex-35 listed company, on the acquisition of 9.5% of ITP Aero from the US fund Bain Capital for €175 million.
Indra and ITP Aero have also reached a framework agreement establishing the basis for a strategic technological collaboration with the aim of enhancing their value, leveraging synergies and promoting the joint development of systems and technologies, including developments linked to the future European air combat programme (FCAS) in which Indra is the national industrial leader.
The GA_P team, led by Guillermo Guerra, partner at Commercial, was made up of: David Riopérez, Carolina Posse and Emiliano Moreno, partner and associates of Commercial, Irene Medina, associate of Banking, Carlos Vázquez, partner of Public and Miguel Troncoso, partner of Competition.
Indra and ITP Aero have also reached a framework agreement establishing the basis for a strategic technological collaboration with the aim of enhancing their value, leveraging synergies and promoting the joint development of systems and technologies, including developments linked to the future European air combat programme (FCAS) in which Indra is the national industrial leader.
The GA_P team, led by Guillermo Guerra, partner at Commercial, was made up of: David Riopérez, Carolina Posse and Emiliano Moreno, partner and associates of Commercial, Irene Medina, associate of Banking, Carlos Vázquez, partner of Public and Miguel Troncoso, partner of Competition.
Lawyer mentioned
David Riopérez – Partner
Carolina Posse Van Der Laat – Senior associate
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
4 days ago
Consequences of the contractual link between individual bank loans taken out by commonhold unit-holders and restoration work agreed between the commonhold association and a third party
Supreme Court Judgment no. 919/2016 of 16 June is groundbreaking in two respects: first, in holding that unit-holders are parties to a contract between the commonhold association and a third party; and second, in holding that this contract is linked to the loan agreements concluded by a bank with said unit-holders.
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
The business judgment rule in a cooperative’s purchase of a financial product that ultimately fails
The first ruling to actually apply the business judgment rule in the determination of a claim in relation to liability.
PUBLICATION
08 Oct, 2026
Ministerial Order TED/966/2026 of 15 September: creation of Spain’s capacity market
The creation of the capacity market will ensure availability of power in the mainland electricity system by paying providers that undertake to make capacity available during periods of stress, thereby ensuring the security of electricity supply.
PUBLICATION
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
PUBLICATION
21 Sep, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 50
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
18 Sep, 2026
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Public consultation now open on the Royal Decree regulating the requirements for energy sustainability, environmental sustainability, digital resilience and digital sovereignty applicable to data centres
PUBLICATION
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
17 Jul, 2026
Claim assignment and assignment of right to rescind underlying contract
There is no single answer to the question of whether or not the assignee of a claim has the power to rescind the underlying contract when the assigned debtor defaults. As a general rule, such rescission will not be possible for the assignee.