Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Indra on the acquisition of a 9.5% stake in ITP Aero
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Indra Sistemas, S.A., an Ibex-35 listed company, on the acquisition of 9.5% of ITP Aero from the US fund Bain Capital for €175 million.
Indra and ITP Aero have also reached a framework agreement establishing the basis for a strategic technological collaboration with the aim of enhancing their value, leveraging synergies and promoting the joint development of systems and technologies, including developments linked to the future European air combat programme (FCAS) in which Indra is the national industrial leader.
The GA_P team, led by Guillermo Guerra, partner at Commercial, was made up of: David Riopérez, Carolina Posse and Emiliano Moreno, partner and associates of Commercial, Irene Medina, associate of Banking, Carlos Vázquez, partner of Public and Miguel Troncoso, partner of Competition.
Indra and ITP Aero have also reached a framework agreement establishing the basis for a strategic technological collaboration with the aim of enhancing their value, leveraging synergies and promoting the joint development of systems and technologies, including developments linked to the future European air combat programme (FCAS) in which Indra is the national industrial leader.
The GA_P team, led by Guillermo Guerra, partner at Commercial, was made up of: David Riopérez, Carolina Posse and Emiliano Moreno, partner and associates of Commercial, Irene Medina, associate of Banking, Carlos Vázquez, partner of Public and Miguel Troncoso, partner of Competition.
Lawyer mentioned
David Riopérez – Partner
Carolina Posse Van Der Laat – Senior associate
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
Pharma & Healthcare No. 50
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
5 days ago
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Public consultation now open on the Royal Decree regulating the requirements for energy sustainability, environmental sustainability, digital resilience and digital sovereignty applicable to data centres
PUBLICATION
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
17 Jul, 2026
Claim assignment and assignment of right to rescind underlying contract
There is no single answer to the question of whether or not the assignee of a claim has the power to rescind the underlying contract when the assigned debtor defaults. As a general rule, such rescission will not be possible for the assignee.
PUBLICATION
16 Jul, 2026
New EU regulation on the screening of foreign investments
Regulation (EU) 2026/1386 establishes a harmonised and mandatory framework for the screening of foreign investments in the Union and replaces the previous Regulation (EU) 2019/452. Among its most notable new features are the obligation for all Member States to have a national screening mechanism with harmonised minimum requirements; the inclusion within its scope of investments made by European subsidiaries controlled by third-country investors; the implementation of a two-stage national procedure; and the strengthening of the European cooperation mechanism through a risk-screening system and a more stringent “comply or explain” principle.
Finally, the paper analyses the regulation’s impact on Spain, whose current review mechanism must be adapted in areas such as procedural structure, the review of completed transactions, sectoral expansion, and the penalty regime by 17 January 2028.
PUBLICATION
08 Jul, 2026
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.
PUBLICATION
23 Jun, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 49
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.