Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Davidson Kempner on the recapitalisation of Grupo Siro
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised on the acquisition and capitalisation of the financial debt and the additional liquidity provision. With this new investment, Davidson Kempner Capital Management now holds a significant majority of the Group’s share capital. This is one of the main “loan to own” transactions carried out in Spain in recent years, together with Codere and Naviera Armas, in which the firm has also played a leading role.
The advisors in the operation were: Miguel Lamo de Espinosa, Paula Zarzalejos and María Fanego from Banking and Finance, Pablo Fernandez Cortijo, Ignacio de la Fuente, Luis Pinedo and Carolina Orri from Corporate, and Lourdes Escassi and Carmen Abad from Employment.
Read full article
The advisors in the operation were: Miguel Lamo de Espinosa, Paula Zarzalejos and María Fanego from Banking and Finance, Pablo Fernandez Cortijo, Ignacio de la Fuente, Luis Pinedo and Carolina Orri from Corporate, and Lourdes Escassi and Carmen Abad from Employment.
Read full article
Lawyer mentioned
Paula Zarzalejos – Partner
María Fanego – Senior associate
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Category
Deal
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
One week ago
Consequences of the contractual link between individual bank loans taken out by commonhold unit-holders and restoration work agreed between the commonhold association and a third party
Supreme Court Judgment no. 919/2016 of 16 June is groundbreaking in two respects: first, in holding that unit-holders are parties to a contract between the commonhold association and a third party; and second, in holding that this contract is linked to the loan agreements concluded by a bank with said unit-holders.
PUBLICATION
14 Oct, 2026
The business judgment rule in a cooperative’s purchase of a financial product that ultimately fails
The first ruling to actually apply the business judgment rule in the determination of a claim in relation to liability.
PUBLICATION
23 Sep, 2026
Paradoxes of non-binding and entire agreement clauses being meta-clauses
Inasmuch as functioning as meta-clauses, non-binding and entire agreement clauses are paradoxical in a number of ways.
PUBLICATION
18 Sep, 2026
Resolved bank found liable as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Emails sent by a company to its staff during collective bargaining do not always violate freedom of association
Emails sent by a company to its staff during a negotiation process do not, in and of themselves, constitute anti-union interference or unlawful pressure, provided they fall within the scope of the company’s freedom of expression and the legitimate defence of its business interests.
PUBLICATION
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
08 Jul, 2026
Are company directors directly liable for torts attributable to the company?
Debt from liability in tort for third-party damage or loss arises directly against the directors, without prejudice to the fact that, pursuant to Article 38 CC, it also arises simultaneously against the company, to which the non-contractual acts or omissions of its directors are also attributed. This is so true that the liable company (in debt, for example, with the tax authorities as the person liable for the surcharge and the tax penalty owed) may bring an action for contribution against its directors after settling the debt.
PUBLICATION
15 Jun, 2026
Conclusions on the abuse of temporary public sector employment: finding a balance between domestic laws and EU law
PUBLICATION
09 Jun, 2026
The “serious risk” of financial assistance (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment of 5 May 2026)
This paper critically analyses the Supreme Court ruling of 5May 2026, which applies the prohibition on financial assistance to a case involving the sale of treasury shares with deferred payment to the shareholders of the assisting company.