Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Berria Bikes on the sale of 49% of the company to Suma Capital
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised the partners of Berria Bikes, and the company itself, on the drafting and negotiation of the relevant Share Purchase and Sale Agreements and Investment Agreement and Shareholders’ Agreement, as well as on the relevant corporate agreements and senior management contracts, in connection with the acquisition of a 49% stake by certain funds managed by Suma Capital for a value of €15M (between cash out and cash in).
Berria Bikes, a company from Castilla-La Mancha, was founded in 2012 by Spanish-Swiss professional cyclists David and José Vitoria.
Through the mid-market fund SC Growth II, Suma Capital has taken 49% of Berria in a combined share purchase and capital increase transaction that has been closed for approximately €15 million.
The GA_P team is formed by Miguel Ángel Melero, of counsel of Corporate, Miguel Azpeitia, junior associate of Corporate, Iván Escribano, senior associate of Tax and Laura Castillo, senior associate of Labour.
Read the full article.
Berria Bikes, a company from Castilla-La Mancha, was founded in 2012 by Spanish-Swiss professional cyclists David and José Vitoria.
Through the mid-market fund SC Growth II, Suma Capital has taken 49% of Berria in a combined share purchase and capital increase transaction that has been closed for approximately €15 million.
The GA_P team is formed by Miguel Ángel Melero, of counsel of Corporate, Miguel Azpeitia, junior associate of Corporate, Iván Escribano, senior associate of Tax and Laura Castillo, senior associate of Labour.
Read the full article.
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
2 days ago
Resolved bank’s liability as pledgee of third-party owned shares in the bank
The fiduciary nature of the managed investment relationship supports the view that the bank should be liable for the loss of the pledged item because there would not have been such loss had the client’s order been executed prior to the bank’s resolution — but not for the reason given in the judgment.
PUBLICATION
5 days ago
Sale of essential assets without shareholder approval and the enforceability of such violation against third parties
The Supreme Court (Judgment no. 881/2026 of 9 June) has held that Article 234(2) of the Companies Act is applicable by analogy in a case where a company director disposed of essential company assets without the required authorisation from the shareholders in general meeting (Art. 160(f) of the Companies Act).
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Emails sent by a company to its staff during collective bargaining do not always violate freedom of association
Emails sent by a company to its staff during a negotiation process do not, in and of themselves, constitute anti-union interference or unlawful pressure, provided they fall within the scope of the company’s freedom of expression and the legitimate defence of its business interests.
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Public consultation now open on the Royal Decree regulating the requirements for energy sustainability, environmental sustainability, digital resilience and digital sovereignty applicable to data centres
PUBLICATION
11 Sep, 2026
Agreement offsetting leasehold improvements against future commercial lease payments: third-party purchaser takes the stage
Is a set-off agreement enforceable against a purchaser seeking to collect new lease payments? Although the answer is not clear-cut, ultimately the lessee will not leave without compensation for the improvements
PUBLICATION
31 Jul, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 31
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
28 Jul, 2026
Derogations from the principle of supervision in the home Member State in respect of information society services and control over content by means of an algorithm
The Court (Grand Chamber) defines the scope of derogations from the principle of supervision in the home Member State for information society services on grounds of public policy, security and safety, clarifying the distinction between general prohibitions and individualized measures directed at specific providers. It also provides important criteria regarding the liability of digital platforms, holding that control exercised by means of algorithms may preclude the application of the exemption from liability provided for data hosting services.
PUBLICATION
23 Jul, 2026
New regime for giving international effect to judicial sales of ships
UN Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships establishes a mechanism to ensure that judicial sales of ships which confer clean title in the State Party in which they are conducted produce the same effect in other State Parties without bureaucratic obstacles that hinder trade in this sector.
PUBLICATION
22 Jul, 2026
Shipowner and package travel organiser: on whether the limitations of liability under the Athens Convention apply
The matter at issue is whether the shipowner, which provides a passenger transport service as part of package travel organised and sold by a travel wholesaler or retailer, may invoke the limitations of liability specific to maritime transport against the tourist and against the organiser; but, above all, whether the organiser may also invoke them against its client.