Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Indigo Group on the acquisition of one of Zaragoza’s main car parks
1 March, 2023
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Grupo Indigo, a world leader in mobility services, on the acquisition of a car park located in Plaza de España in Zaragoza, one of the main car parks in the city.
The team was formed by David Riopérez and Luis Pinedo, partner and associate of the Commercial practice; José Antonio Gómez Calafat, associate of the Insolvency practice; Mariana Díaz-Moro and Pablo Soler, partner and associate of the Tax practice; Lourdes Escassi, Of Counsel of the Labour practice; and José Ramón Pérez-Álvarez, associate of the Real Estate practice.
The team was formed by David Riopérez and Luis Pinedo, partner and associate of the Commercial practice; José Antonio Gómez Calafat, associate of the Insolvency practice; Mariana Díaz-Moro and Pablo Soler, partner and associate of the Tax practice; Lourdes Escassi, Of Counsel of the Labour practice; and José Ramón Pérez-Álvarez, associate of the Real Estate practice.
Lawyer mentioned
David Riopérez – Partner
Luis Nicolás Pinedo – Associate
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Category
Deal
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
2 days ago 
PUBLICATION
5 days ago
Conclusions on the abuse of temporary public sector employment: finding a balance between domestic laws and EU law
5 days ago 
PUBLICATION
09 Jun, 2026
The “serious risk” of financial assistance (Supreme Court (First Chamber) Judgment of 5 May 2026)
This paper critically analyses the Supreme Court ruling of 5May 2026, which applies the prohibition on financial assistance to a case involving the sale of treasury shares with deferred payment to the shareholders of the assisting company.
09 Jun, 2026
PUBLICATION
28 May, 2026
Voluntary takeover bids and squeeze-outs
The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026 (Korfin and Sempiola v Slovnaft, Case C-225/25) clarifies the concept of a takeover bid for the purposes of Article 2 of the 2004 Takeover Bids Directive, such that an offer made to the holders of securities of a company with a view to acquiring all or some of those securities does not fall within the concept of a takeover bid where it is made by an offeror who already controls the offeree company. Consequently, based on that court’s interpretation of the Directive’s provisions, there is no right of squeeze-out in such voluntary takeover bids.
28 May, 2026
PUBLICATION
26 May, 2026
Severance pay is a claim against the insolvent estate - not an insolvency claim - if a pre-opening-of-insolvency-proceedings dismissal is ruled unfair post hoc
Notwithstanding a dismissal occurring before the opening of insolvency proceedings, if a court finding of unfairness and an employer decision to make a severance payment occur after, the dismissed employee’s claim must be deemed against the insolvent estate, even if the parties had reached a settlement, if such was reached also after.
26 May, 2026
PUBLICATION
18 May, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 30
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
18 May, 2026
PUBLICATION
21 Apr, 2026
The 28th Corporate Regime: the EU Inc.
The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the 28th Regime Corporate Legal Framework – ‘EU Inc.’, dated 18 March 2026, introduces a new form of European private limited company. Originally envisaged for start-ups and scale-ups, it has been decided to allow its adoption by all companies. There is no minimum share capital requirement; shares may have no nominal value and may carry multiple voting rights, among other features. The Commission is expected to approve model articles of association so that a company can be incorporated online in less than forty-eight hours and for less than one hundred euros.
21 Apr, 2026
PUBLICATION
17 Apr, 2026
Can a framework agreement lacking an exclusivity or minimum orders clause be discharged by breach?
All cases decided by the Supreme Court and their specific details are discussed. There is no single solution to the problem of terminating a framework supply of services agreement without an exclusivity clause or a minimum purchases obligation.
17 Apr, 2026
Tax Litigation
16 Apr, 2026
Do purchasers of apartments and premises take on, by way of subrogation, planning obligations arising from a land readjustment procedure?
Whether or not the purchasers of residential apartments and commercial premises take on, by way of subrogation, the planning obligations arising from a land readjustment procedure, has always been a conundrum on account of the economic and social impact that an affirmative answer would have on the end recipients of housing. The Supreme Court has yet to rule on this matter.
16 Apr, 2026
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2026
What rights does a landlord have when a commercial tenant vacates the premises before the agreed term has expired?
Although the judgment states that the landlord has three remedies available, in reality he has only one — whether he seeks performance or opts for termination — which is damages.
25 Mar, 2026