Go back to News
NEWS
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo incorporates Saturnina Moreno González and strengthens its tax litigation team. | Expansión
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has committed to strengthening the Tax Litigation Team, highlighting its experience and knowledge in the defense of controversial matters in this area. This team has also begun to publish its opinion on different issues on a weekly basis, in a constructive manner and exploring their effects. In this sense, and to further strengthen the academic support in this area, Saturnina Moreno González, Professor of Financial and Tax Law at the University of Castilla-La Mancha, who has a solid academic and professional background, has joined the Academic Council of the firm. Her research and professional practice focus on international and European taxation, taxation of the digital economy and Spanish tax regulations.
Throughout her career, Saturnina has published numerous articles and books in the field of tax law, and has participated as a speaker at national and international conferences. Her in-depth knowledge and experience in financial and tax law make her a strategic addition to the team and to the firm.
“We are confident that Saturnina Moreno González will strengthen our Tax Litigation team as well as the rest of the professionals working in the Tax area. Her experience and knowledge will be of great value to our clients and to the firm in general,” said Enrique Ortega, Tax Coordinator. “His incorporation reinforces our commitment to offer excellent legal advice in an increasingly complex and globalized environment.”
With this addition, Gómez-Acebo & Pombo continues its strategy of expansion and reinforcement of its key areas, counting on the best professionals to meet the needs of its clients in a constantly evolving legal environment.
Read full article
Throughout her career, Saturnina has published numerous articles and books in the field of tax law, and has participated as a speaker at national and international conferences. Her in-depth knowledge and experience in financial and tax law make her a strategic addition to the team and to the firm.
“We are confident that Saturnina Moreno González will strengthen our Tax Litigation team as well as the rest of the professionals working in the Tax area. Her experience and knowledge will be of great value to our clients and to the firm in general,” said Enrique Ortega, Tax Coordinator. “His incorporation reinforces our commitment to offer excellent legal advice in an increasingly complex and globalized environment.”
With this addition, Gómez-Acebo & Pombo continues its strategy of expansion and reinforcement of its key areas, counting on the best professionals to meet the needs of its clients in a constantly evolving legal environment.
Read full article
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
Tax Litigation
¡NEW!
Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations
Joint audits in the context of mutual assistance: procedural aspects and taxpayers’ rights and obligations
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Use as pastiche of another person's work or rendition protected by copyright
This paper examines the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 April 2026, Pelham (C-590/23, ECLI:EU:C:2026:290), which interprets the exception for pastiche contained in Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.
PUBLICATION
¡NEW!
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 30
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
5 days ago
Supreme Court clarifies VAT treatment of intra-group transfers of shares carried out by mixed holding companies
The Supreme Court has established ‘cassational’ doctrine regarding the treatment under value-added tax of intra-group transfers of shares by mixed holding companies. It is confirmed that the intra-group transfer of shares constitutes a financial activity that cannot generally be classified as a management support activity. Likewise, it is acknowledged that an intra-group transfer of shares may not be subject to said tax when it involves the indirect transfer of an independent economic unit, subjecting such exclusion to the circumstances surrounding the transaction.
PUBLICATION
6 days ago
Supreme Court rules on ‘administrative silence’ in the electricity sector: “public service” or “service of general economic interest”
The Supreme Court judgment of 10 April 2026 characterises the concept of public service under Article 24(1) of Act 39/2015 as an exception to the ‘double silence’ rule, distinguishing it from the concept of service of general economic interest, which applies in liberalized sectors such as that of electricity supply. The Supreme Court thus concludes that in seeking an authorisation to close a combined-cycle power plant, the ‘double silence’ rule applies to the effect of a presumption of approval.
PUBLICATION
30 Apr, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 48
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
30 Apr, 2026
New customer service and telemarketing numbers
The State Secretariat for Telecommunications and Digital Infrastructures has published, on 14 April 2016, two decisions: one allocating public numbering resources to customer service and laying down the general terms of use thereof, and the other allocating public numbering resources to telemarketing and laying down the general terms of use thereof.
PUBLICATION
29 Apr, 2026
Limitation of a patent and the Unified Patent Court’s ‘long arm’
We analyse the problems that arise when a claim is filed with the UPC for infringement of a unitary patent and, at the same time, for infringement of the validation of the basic European patent in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, and the claimant solely limits the unitary patent (because the defendant only files a counterclaim for revocation of the unitary patent with said court, but does not initiate any parallel revocation proceedings with the competent national court against the validations of the basic European patent in States that are not party to said agreement).
PUBLICATION
27 Apr, 2026
Separate restructuring strategies among joint and several co-debtors
The basis for this paper is a slightly modified real-life case, broadened to include all possible forms of plurality of debtors.