Go back to News
NEWS
Jorge Martín joins Gómez-Acebo & Pombo as Of Counsel in the Corporate Department
6 of September, 2023
Jorge Martín, until now Counsel at Clifford Chance, has more than 13 years of experience and specialises in advising on mergers and acquisitions (M&A), both to financial investors (private equity) and to listed and unlisted companies. He is an associate professor of Commercial Law at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and is recognised as Associate to watch in Corporate / M&A by Chambers & Partners and Rising Star in Corporate / M&A and Private Equity by Legal 500.
Jorge holds a degree in Law and Business Administration from the Universidad Pontificia de Comillas (ICADE) and in 2021 he qualified as a Solicitor of England and Wales. He began his professional career at Uría Menéndez, before joining Clifford Chance where he has spent the last eight years.
Álvaro Mateo, partner coordinating the Corporate practice highlights: “We are very pleased that such talented people with such a solid track record as Jorge have chosen to develop their professional careers at Gómez-Acebo & Pombo. Jorge’s incorporation will be an important boost for the team and will help us to continue consolidating our position in the high value-added transactional market”. Jorge comments: “Being part of the project of a Firm like Gómez-Acebo & Pombo in the national and international market is a challenge that I am particularly excited about and that I am looking forward to facing with great enthusiasm.
Read article El Confidencial
Read article Cinco Días
Read article Expansión
Jorge holds a degree in Law and Business Administration from the Universidad Pontificia de Comillas (ICADE) and in 2021 he qualified as a Solicitor of England and Wales. He began his professional career at Uría Menéndez, before joining Clifford Chance where he has spent the last eight years.
Álvaro Mateo, partner coordinating the Corporate practice highlights: “We are very pleased that such talented people with such a solid track record as Jorge have chosen to develop their professional careers at Gómez-Acebo & Pombo. Jorge’s incorporation will be an important boost for the team and will help us to continue consolidating our position in the high value-added transactional market”. Jorge comments: “Being part of the project of a Firm like Gómez-Acebo & Pombo in the national and international market is a challenge that I am particularly excited about and that I am looking forward to facing with great enthusiasm.
Read article El Confidencial
Read article Cinco Días
Read article Expansión
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
¡NEW! 
PUBLICATION
Inside Information and Quarterly Financial Statements: CNMV Communication of 13 October 2021
The CNMV notes in this communication that, although there are no closed periods in respect of the voluntary publication by issuers of the quarterly financial report, this report may contain inside information, in which case the Market Abuse Regulation applies
18 Oct, 2021 
PUBLICATION
Administrative liability of the members of a listed company’s audit committee for serious errors or inaccuracies in the audited annual accounts
The Supreme Court's judgment of 8 October 2020 confirms the administrative liability of Audit Committee members for the inaccuracy or lack of veracity of consolidated annual accounts that have been externally audited
13 Nov, 2020
PUBLICATION
Current Legislation No. 24
GA_P’s Current Legislation digests seek to provide an overview of the main legal issues of interest to our readers, clients and lawyers in a format that combines three elements: topicality, clarity and quality. Topicality in the information and in the selection of matters discussed; clarity in laying the foregoing in a concise and intelligible manner rather than...
10 Jul, 2018
PUBLICATION
Payment periods disallowed under the Late Commercial Payments Act: inappropriate voidness
We are accustomed to hearing the assertion that a bilaterally agreed clause contravening the statutory rule setting a time limit for commercial payments is void ab initio. But is this case when it is the supplier who has the bargaining power? And, in general, does such an assertion make sense?
05 Jul, 2018